Observations of Positive Parenting from Online Parent-Child Interactions at Age 1.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Parenting-Science and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15295192.2023.2286454
Rebecca Waller, Yael Paz, Megan M Himes, Lauren K White, Yuheiry Rodriguez, Alesandra Gorgone, Joan Luby, Emily D Gerstein, Rebecca G Brady, Barbara H Chaiyachati, Andrea Duncan, Ran Barzilay, Sara L Kornfield, Heather H Burris, Jakob Seidlitz, Julia Parish-Morris, Nina Laney, Raquel E Gur, Wanjikũ F M Njoroge
{"title":"Observations of Positive Parenting from Online Parent-Child Interactions at Age 1.","authors":"Rebecca Waller, Yael Paz, Megan M Himes, Lauren K White, Yuheiry Rodriguez, Alesandra Gorgone, Joan Luby, Emily D Gerstein, Rebecca G Brady, Barbara H Chaiyachati, Andrea Duncan, Ran Barzilay, Sara L Kornfield, Heather H Burris, Jakob Seidlitz, Julia Parish-Morris, Nina Laney, Raquel E Gur, Wanjikũ F M Njoroge","doi":"10.1080/15295192.2023.2286454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Brief, reliable, and cost-effective methods to assess parenting are critical for advancing parenting research.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We adapted the Three Bags task and Parent Child Interaction Rating System (PCIRS) for rating online visits with 219 parent-child dyads (White, <i>n</i> = 104 [47.5%], Black, <i>n</i> = 115 [52.5%]) and combined the video data with survey data collected during pregnancy and when children were aged 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PCIRS codes of positive regard, stimulation of child cognitive development, and sensitivity showed high reliability across the three parent-child interaction tasks. A latent positive parenting factor combining ratings across codes and tasks showed good model fit, which was similar regardless of parent self-identified race or ethnicity, age, socioeconomic disadvantage, marital/partnered status, and parity, as well as methodological factors relevant to the online video assessment method (e.g., phone vs. laptop/tablet). In support of construct validity, observed positive parenting was related to parent-reported positive parenting and child socioemotional development. Finally, parent reports of supportive relationships in pregnancy, but not neighborhood safety or pandemic worries, were prospectively related to higher positive parenting observed at age 1. With the exception of older parental age and married/partnered status, no other parent, child, sociodemographic, or methodological variables were related to higher overall video exclusions across tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCIRS may provide a reliable approach to rate positive parenting at age 1, providing future avenues for developing more ecologically valid assessments and implementing interventions through online encounters that may be more acceptable, accessible, or preferred among parents of young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":47432,"journal":{"name":"Parenting-Science and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10766433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parenting-Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2023.2286454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Brief, reliable, and cost-effective methods to assess parenting are critical for advancing parenting research.

Design: We adapted the Three Bags task and Parent Child Interaction Rating System (PCIRS) for rating online visits with 219 parent-child dyads (White, n = 104 [47.5%], Black, n = 115 [52.5%]) and combined the video data with survey data collected during pregnancy and when children were aged 1.

Results: The PCIRS codes of positive regard, stimulation of child cognitive development, and sensitivity showed high reliability across the three parent-child interaction tasks. A latent positive parenting factor combining ratings across codes and tasks showed good model fit, which was similar regardless of parent self-identified race or ethnicity, age, socioeconomic disadvantage, marital/partnered status, and parity, as well as methodological factors relevant to the online video assessment method (e.g., phone vs. laptop/tablet). In support of construct validity, observed positive parenting was related to parent-reported positive parenting and child socioemotional development. Finally, parent reports of supportive relationships in pregnancy, but not neighborhood safety or pandemic worries, were prospectively related to higher positive parenting observed at age 1. With the exception of older parental age and married/partnered status, no other parent, child, sociodemographic, or methodological variables were related to higher overall video exclusions across tasks.

Conclusions: PCIRS may provide a reliable approach to rate positive parenting at age 1, providing future avenues for developing more ecologically valid assessments and implementing interventions through online encounters that may be more acceptable, accessible, or preferred among parents of young children.

从 1 岁时的在线亲子互动中观察积极的亲子关系。
目的简短、可靠、经济有效的亲子关系评估方法对于推进亲子关系研究至关重要:设计:我们改编了 "三袋 "任务和亲子互动评级系统(PCIRS),用于对 219 个亲子二人组(白人,n = 104 [47.5%];黑人,n = 115 [52.5%])的在线访问进行评级,并将视频数据与孕期和孩子 1 岁时收集的调查数据相结合:在三项亲子互动任务中,PCIRS 关于积极关注、刺激儿童认知发展和敏感性的编码显示出高度的可靠性。一个潜在的积极养育因素结合了不同代码和任务的评分,显示出良好的模型拟合度,与父母自我认同的种族或民族、年龄、社会经济劣势、婚姻/伴侣状况、均等以及与在线视频评估方法相关的方法学因素(如手机与笔记本电脑/平板电脑)相似。为支持建构有效性,观察到的积极养育与家长报告的积极养育和儿童社会情感发展相关。最后,父母对孕期支持性关系的报告与 1 岁时观察到的较高积极养育水平有关,但与邻里安全或流行病担忧无关。除了父母年龄较大和已婚/有伴侣的状况外,没有其他父母、儿童、社会人口学或方法学变量与不同任务中较高的整体视频排除率有关:PCIRS 可为评价 1 岁儿童的积极养育行为提供一种可靠的方法,从而为开发更多生态学上有效的评估方法和通过在线接触实施干预措施提供了新的途径,在线接触可能更容易被幼儿家长接受、使用或偏爱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Parenting: Science and Practice strives to promote the exchange of empirical findings, theoretical perspectives, and methodological approaches from all disciplines that help to define and advance theory, research, and practice in parenting, caregiving, and childrearing broadly construed. "Parenting" is interpreted to include biological parents and grandparents, adoptive parents, nonparental caregivers, and others, including infrahuman parents. Articles on parenting itself, antecedents of parenting, parenting effects on parents and on children, the multiple contexts of parenting, and parenting interventions and education are all welcome. The journal brings parenting to science and science to parenting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信