Updated prevalence of latent prostate cancer in Chinese population and comparison of biopsy results: An autopsy-based study

IF 33.2 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yuliang Chen, Zhien Zhou, Yi Zhou, Zhipeng Mai, Shijie Jin, Zhen Liang, Zhiyuan Shang, Yuzhi Zuo, Yu Xiao, Wenze Wang, Haibo Wang, Weigang Yan
{"title":"Updated prevalence of latent prostate cancer in Chinese population and comparison of biopsy results: An autopsy-based study","authors":"Yuliang Chen, Zhien Zhou, Yi Zhou, Zhipeng Mai, Shijie Jin, Zhen Liang, Zhiyuan Shang, Yuzhi Zuo, Yu Xiao, Wenze Wang, Haibo Wang, Weigang Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prostate cancer detected by autopsy is named latent prostate cancer. As the repertoire of clinical prostate cancer, latent cancer may better reflect the disease burden. Unlike clinical prostate specimens, which are obtained exclusively from biopsy-positive cases, prostate specimens obtained through autopsy provide information on biopsy-negative cases, helping calculate the true sensitivity of prostate biopsy. From 2014 to 2021, we collected autopsy specimens of the prostate from body donors in China and performed transperineal and transrectal biopsies on specimens before step-sectioning and pathological measurements. We found that the crude prevalence of latent prostate cancer in middle-aged and elderly men was 35.1% (81/231), which was higher than previous estimates for Chinese populations. The overall per-patient sensitivities of transperineal and transrectal biopsies were not significantly different (33.3% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.82), but the two approaches differed in preferential sampling area along the proximal-distal axis of the prostate. Transperineal biopsy had a higher sensitivity for detecting clinically significant lesions in the distal third (34.7% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.02) and distal half (30.6% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.04), while transrectal biopsy had a higher sensitivity for lesions in the proximal half (25.0% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.046). Both transperineal and transrectal methods of biopsy missed most small lesions (&lt;0.1 mL) and 35.3% (6/17) of large lesions (&gt;0.5 mL). In conclusion, the prevalence of latent prostate cancer in China has increased over the past 2 decades. Systematic transperineal and transrectal methods of biopsy had comparable sensitivities but had different preferential sampling areas. Both approaches miss one-third of large lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36121,"journal":{"name":"The Innovation","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100558","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate cancer detected by autopsy is named latent prostate cancer. As the repertoire of clinical prostate cancer, latent cancer may better reflect the disease burden. Unlike clinical prostate specimens, which are obtained exclusively from biopsy-positive cases, prostate specimens obtained through autopsy provide information on biopsy-negative cases, helping calculate the true sensitivity of prostate biopsy. From 2014 to 2021, we collected autopsy specimens of the prostate from body donors in China and performed transperineal and transrectal biopsies on specimens before step-sectioning and pathological measurements. We found that the crude prevalence of latent prostate cancer in middle-aged and elderly men was 35.1% (81/231), which was higher than previous estimates for Chinese populations. The overall per-patient sensitivities of transperineal and transrectal biopsies were not significantly different (33.3% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.82), but the two approaches differed in preferential sampling area along the proximal-distal axis of the prostate. Transperineal biopsy had a higher sensitivity for detecting clinically significant lesions in the distal third (34.7% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.02) and distal half (30.6% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.04), while transrectal biopsy had a higher sensitivity for lesions in the proximal half (25.0% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.046). Both transperineal and transrectal methods of biopsy missed most small lesions (<0.1 mL) and 35.3% (6/17) of large lesions (>0.5 mL). In conclusion, the prevalence of latent prostate cancer in China has increased over the past 2 decades. Systematic transperineal and transrectal methods of biopsy had comparable sensitivities but had different preferential sampling areas. Both approaches miss one-third of large lesions.

Abstract Image

中国人群中潜伏前列腺癌的最新发病率及活检结果比较:基于尸检的研究
通过尸检发现的前列腺癌被命名为潜伏前列腺癌。作为临床前列腺癌的样本,潜伏癌可以更好地反映疾病负担。与临床前列腺标本完全取自活检阳性病例不同,通过尸检获得的前列腺标本可提供活检阴性病例的信息,有助于计算前列腺活检的真实灵敏度。从 2014 年到 2021 年,我们在中国收集了遗体捐献者的前列腺尸检标本,并对标本进行了经会阴和经直肠活检,然后进行分步切片和病理测量。我们发现,中老年男性前列腺癌潜伏期的粗患病率为 35.1%(81/231),高于以往对中国人群的估计。经会阴活检和经直肠活检对每位患者的总体敏感度没有显著差异(33.3% vs. 32.1%,p = 0.82),但两种方法对前列腺近端-远端轴线的取样区域的偏好不同。经会阴活检对检测远端三分之一(34.7% vs. 16.3%,p = 0.02)和远端一半(30.6% vs. 18.1%,p = 0.04)有临床意义病变的敏感性更高,而经直肠活检对检测近端一半病变的敏感性更高(25.0% vs. 13.9%,p = 0.046)。经会阴和经直肠活检方法都漏检了大多数小病灶(0.1 mL)和35.3%(6/17)的大病灶(0.5 mL)。总之,在过去 20 年中,中国前列腺癌潜伏期的发病率有所上升。系统性经会阴活检和经直肠活检的灵敏度相当,但取样部位不同。两种方法都会漏检三分之一的大病灶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Innovation
The Innovation MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
38.30
自引率
1.20%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Innovation is an interdisciplinary journal that aims to promote scientific application. It publishes cutting-edge research and high-quality reviews in various scientific disciplines, including physics, chemistry, materials, nanotechnology, biology, translational medicine, geoscience, and engineering. The journal adheres to the peer review and publishing standards of Cell Press journals. The Innovation is committed to serving scientists and the public. It aims to publish significant advances promptly and provides a transparent exchange platform. The journal also strives to efficiently promote the translation from scientific discovery to technological achievements and rapidly disseminate scientific findings worldwide. Indexed in the following databases, The Innovation has visibility in Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Web of Science, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), PubMed Central, Compendex (previously Ei index), INSPEC, and CABI A&I.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信