A Comparative Study of Hungarian and Indian University Students’ Attitudes Toward Forestry

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
István Fekete, Jayanta Banerjee, Suddhasanta De, Jutka Nmar-Kendöl
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Hungarian and Indian University Students’ Attitudes Toward Forestry","authors":"István Fekete, Jayanta Banerjee, Suddhasanta De, Jutka Nmar-Kendöl","doi":"10.37045/aslh-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attitudes toward using wood as a raw material vary greatly, from anti-logging and anti-felling propaganda to the propagation of wood use. This study examines attitudes toward wood, trees, and sustainable forest management in two distinct cultures – India and Hungary. Our questionnaire survey findings indicate that sustainable forest management is considered more important in India than in Hungary and that environmental education is more widespread in India (40 %) than in Hungary (19 %). Over 30 % of people in both countries do not plan to keep wood-related traditions or customs. Indian students lean more toward discontinuing the wide use of wood than Hungarian students do. However, anti-logging/anti-felling propaganda is more widespread in Hungary (85 %) than in India (62 %). Passing wooden tools to the next generation shows a decreasing trend, which is significant from a carbon sequestration, carbon storage perspective, and climate protection. The study findings suggest that keeping wood-related traditions and customs should be strengthened in both countries through environmental education.","PeriodicalId":53620,"journal":{"name":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37045/aslh-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attitudes toward using wood as a raw material vary greatly, from anti-logging and anti-felling propaganda to the propagation of wood use. This study examines attitudes toward wood, trees, and sustainable forest management in two distinct cultures – India and Hungary. Our questionnaire survey findings indicate that sustainable forest management is considered more important in India than in Hungary and that environmental education is more widespread in India (40 %) than in Hungary (19 %). Over 30 % of people in both countries do not plan to keep wood-related traditions or customs. Indian students lean more toward discontinuing the wide use of wood than Hungarian students do. However, anti-logging/anti-felling propaganda is more widespread in Hungary (85 %) than in India (62 %). Passing wooden tools to the next generation shows a decreasing trend, which is significant from a carbon sequestration, carbon storage perspective, and climate protection. The study findings suggest that keeping wood-related traditions and customs should be strengthened in both countries through environmental education.
匈牙利和印度大学生对林业态度的比较研究
人们对使用木材作为原材料的态度大相径庭,既有反砍伐、反砍伐的宣传,也有使用木材的宣传。本研究探讨了印度和匈牙利两种不同文化中人们对木材、树木和可持续森林管理的态度。我们的问卷调查结果表明,可持续森林管理在印度比在匈牙利更为重要,环境教育在印度(40%)比在匈牙利(19%)更为普及。两国都有超过 30% 的人不打算保留与木材有关的传统或习俗。印度学生比匈牙利学生更倾向于停止广泛使用木材。然而,反伐木/反砍伐的宣传在匈牙利(85%)比在印度(62%)更普遍。将木制工具传给下一代的现象呈下降趋势,这从碳封存、碳储存和气候保护的角度来看意义重大。研究结果表明,两国都应通过环境教育来加强保留与木材有关的传统和习俗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信