Provider Awareness of Postpartum Hemorrhage Risk Assessment Tool at the Time of Admission at a Community Setting

Kimberley Agbo, Woojin Chong
{"title":"Provider Awareness of Postpartum Hemorrhage Risk Assessment Tool at the Time of Admission at a Community Setting","authors":"Kimberley Agbo, Woojin Chong","doi":"10.33425/2639-9474.1244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine the provider's awareness of the postpartum hemorrhage risk assessment tool at the time of admission. In addition, in keeping with the organization’s continual performance improvement philosophy, education on postpartum hemorrhage risk was provided to survey respondents who self-reported that they were unaware or requested additional resources. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized an anonymous survey methodology. We distributed a postpartum hemorrhage awareness risk assessment questionnaire and collected participant responses without personal identifiers over a 3 month time period, January 2023 – March 2023. Analysis was completed using Fischer’s exact test. Alpha level was set to 0.05. Results: 39 participants completed the questionnaire attending physicians: n=10 (25.6%), nursing staff: n=15 (38.5%), and resident physicians: n=14 (35.9%). 7 of the 10 attending physicians (70%) and 9 of the 15 nursing staff (60%) have worked over 10 years in their profession, while 11 of the 14 resident physicians (78.6%) have worked in their profession for 1-5 years (p=<0.0001). 5 of the 10 attending physicians (50%) and 7 of 15 nursing staff (46.7%) were 36-50 years old, while 13 of 14 resident physicians (93%) were 25- 36 years old (p=<0.0001). Majority of the participants were White; 5 attending physicians (50%), 11 nursing staff (73.3%), and 9 resident physicians (64.3%). Nursing staff had the most awareness of the postpartum hemorrhage awareness risk assessment tool at the time of admission (100%) in comparison with attending physicians (50%) and resident physicians (64.3%), (p=0.005). Nursing staff had the most knowledge of where to access the assessment (93.3%) in comparison to attending physicians (10%) and resident physicians (0%), (p=<0.0001). Conclusions: Our study revealed a statistically significant difference in awareness of the postpartum hemorrhage risk assessment tool at the time of admission amongst the 3 groups of providers; attending physicians, nursing staff, and resident physicians. The nursing staff had the most awareness in comparison with other providers. The data also highlighted the inconsistencies with accessing the risk assessment and with communication of information obtained through the assessment among providers. A quality improvement project should involve notifying providers of patients that are stratified to high risk, developing a simpler method for all providers to readily access the risk assessment tool, and increasing preparedness by creating an algorithm or bundle.","PeriodicalId":158343,"journal":{"name":"Nursing &amp; Primary Care","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing &amp; Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9474.1244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine the provider's awareness of the postpartum hemorrhage risk assessment tool at the time of admission. In addition, in keeping with the organization’s continual performance improvement philosophy, education on postpartum hemorrhage risk was provided to survey respondents who self-reported that they were unaware or requested additional resources. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized an anonymous survey methodology. We distributed a postpartum hemorrhage awareness risk assessment questionnaire and collected participant responses without personal identifiers over a 3 month time period, January 2023 – March 2023. Analysis was completed using Fischer’s exact test. Alpha level was set to 0.05. Results: 39 participants completed the questionnaire attending physicians: n=10 (25.6%), nursing staff: n=15 (38.5%), and resident physicians: n=14 (35.9%). 7 of the 10 attending physicians (70%) and 9 of the 15 nursing staff (60%) have worked over 10 years in their profession, while 11 of the 14 resident physicians (78.6%) have worked in their profession for 1-5 years (p=<0.0001). 5 of the 10 attending physicians (50%) and 7 of 15 nursing staff (46.7%) were 36-50 years old, while 13 of 14 resident physicians (93%) were 25- 36 years old (p=<0.0001). Majority of the participants were White; 5 attending physicians (50%), 11 nursing staff (73.3%), and 9 resident physicians (64.3%). Nursing staff had the most awareness of the postpartum hemorrhage awareness risk assessment tool at the time of admission (100%) in comparison with attending physicians (50%) and resident physicians (64.3%), (p=0.005). Nursing staff had the most knowledge of where to access the assessment (93.3%) in comparison to attending physicians (10%) and resident physicians (0%), (p=<0.0001). Conclusions: Our study revealed a statistically significant difference in awareness of the postpartum hemorrhage risk assessment tool at the time of admission amongst the 3 groups of providers; attending physicians, nursing staff, and resident physicians. The nursing staff had the most awareness in comparison with other providers. The data also highlighted the inconsistencies with accessing the risk assessment and with communication of information obtained through the assessment among providers. A quality improvement project should involve notifying providers of patients that are stratified to high risk, developing a simpler method for all providers to readily access the risk assessment tool, and increasing preparedness by creating an algorithm or bundle.
社区医疗机构的医护人员在入院时对产后出血风险评估工具的认识
研究目的本研究的主要目的是确定医疗服务提供者在入院时对产后出血风险评估工具的了解程度。此外,为了与该机构的持续绩效改进理念保持一致,我们还对自称不了解或需要额外资源的调查对象进行了产后出血风险教育。方法:这项横断面研究采用匿名调查的方法。我们分发了一份产后出血风险意识评估问卷,并在 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月的 3 个月时间内收集了受访者的回答,但不包括个人身份识别信息。分析采用费舍尔精确检验。α水平设为 0.05。结果39 名参与者填写了问卷 主治医师:10 人(25.6%),护理人员:15 人(38.5%),住院医师:14 人(35.9%)。10 名主治医师中有 7 名(70%)和 15 名护理人员中有 9 名(60%)从事本专业工作超过 10 年,而 14 名住院医师中有 11 名(78.6%)从事本专业工作 1-5 年(p=<0.0001)。10 名主治医师中有 5 名(50%)和 15 名护理人员中有 7 名(46.7%)的年龄在 36-50 岁之间,而 14 名住院医师中有 13 名(93%)的年龄在 25-36 岁之间(P=<0.0001)。大多数参与者为白人;5 名主治医师(50%)、11 名护理人员(73.3%)和 9 名住院医师(64.3%)。与主治医师(50%)和住院医师(64.3%)相比,护理人员在入院时对产后出血风险评估工具的知晓率最高(100%),(P=0.005)。护理人员最了解从哪里获取评估工具(93.3%),而主治医师(10%)和住院医师(0%)对此一无所知(P=<0.0001)。结论:我们的研究显示,主治医师、护理人员和住院医师这三组医疗人员在入院时对产后出血风险评估工具的认知度存在统计学意义上的显著差异。与其他医护人员相比,护理人员对产后出血风险评估工具的认知度最高。数据还突显了医疗服务提供者在获取风险评估和沟通评估信息方面的不一致。质量改进项目应包括通知医疗服务提供者高风险患者的分层情况,开发一种更简单的方法让所有医疗服务提供者都能随时使用风险评估工具,以及通过创建算法或捆绑程序来提高准备程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信