Textology versus Textual Criticism: Donald Ostrowski and Attributing Texts to Ivan IV and Andrei Kurbskii

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Charles J. Halperin
{"title":"Textology versus Textual Criticism: Donald Ostrowski and Attributing Texts to Ivan IV and Andrei Kurbskii","authors":"Charles J. Halperin","doi":"10.1353/see.2023.a912469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The texts attributed to Prince Andrei Kurbskii, notably his correspondence with Ivan IV and his History of the Grand Prince of Moscow , and to Ivan himself, first and foremost letters responding to Kurbskii, have long been central to historical analyses of Ivan’s rule and reign, providing unequalled evidence of Ivan’s political ideology in particular. Karamzin’s conceptualization of the two periods of Ivan’s reign, the ‘good’ Ivan of the reforms (1547–64) and the ‘bad’ Ivan’s reign of terror, the oprichnina (1565–72)","PeriodicalId":45292,"journal":{"name":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","volume":"2 1","pages":"515 - 539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/see.2023.a912469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The texts attributed to Prince Andrei Kurbskii, notably his correspondence with Ivan IV and his History of the Grand Prince of Moscow , and to Ivan himself, first and foremost letters responding to Kurbskii, have long been central to historical analyses of Ivan’s rule and reign, providing unequalled evidence of Ivan’s political ideology in particular. Karamzin’s conceptualization of the two periods of Ivan’s reign, the ‘good’ Ivan of the reforms (1547–64) and the ‘bad’ Ivan’s reign of terror, the oprichnina (1565–72)
文本学与文本批评:唐纳德-奥斯特洛夫斯基与将文本归于伊凡四世和安德烈-库布尔斯基
归功于安德烈-库布尔斯基王子的文本,特别是他与伊凡四世的通信和他的《莫斯科大公史》,以及伊凡本人的文本,首先是回复库布尔斯基的信件,长期以来一直是伊凡统治和统治历史分析的核心,尤其为伊凡的政治意识形态提供了无与伦比的证据。卡拉姆津将伊凡统治的两个时期概念化,即 "好的 "伊凡改革时期(1547-64 年)和 "坏的 "伊凡恐怖统治时期(1565-72 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Review is the oldest British journal in the field, having been in existence since 1922. Edited and managed by the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, it covers not only the modern and medieval languages and literatures of the Slavonic and East European area, but also history, culture, and political studies. It is published in January, April, July, and October of each year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信