Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights

Svitlana Kovaliova, Oleksandr Svitlychnyi
{"title":"Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights","authors":"Svitlana Kovaliova, Oleksandr Svitlychnyi","doi":"10.31548/law/3.2023.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that Ukraine has a legislative framework in the field of intellectual property, some issues remain unresolved, in particular, it is important to improve the mechanisms for protecting intellectual rights, among which one of the most effective is confiscation. The purpose of the study is to explore the existing problems of criminal law and administrative law confiscation as a special feature of the protection of intellectual property rights. Key research methods include dialectical analysis, which helped obtain the most objective information about problematic processes and phenomena related to confiscation as a special feature of intellectual property protection, and deduction and induction, used to examine regulations. The paper analyses the state of legal protection of intellectual property rights and measures taken by the state to reform the intellectual property system. Attention is drawn to the fact that public relations in the studied area relate to criminal and administrative legal mechanisms related to confiscation. It is noted that depending on the violated regulation, criminal or administrative confiscation is applied to the violator. The paper analyses Ukrainian and foreign regulations that focus on one of the types of ensuring intellectual property rights – confiscation as a special feature of protecting intellectual property rights. Certain shortcomings of the Ukrainian legislation are noted, and it is proposed to make changes to it. Circumstances that motivate the examination of the legislative reflection of confiscation as a special feature of intellectual property protection are outlined. The findings of the study can be utilised by lawyers and officials of law enforcement and other state bodies responsible for confiscation measures directly related to the protection of intellectual property rights. Individual conclusions can serve as a basis for further research on confiscation as a special feature of the protection of intellectual property rights, and proposals can serve to improve the relevant legislation","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law/3.2023.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the fact that Ukraine has a legislative framework in the field of intellectual property, some issues remain unresolved, in particular, it is important to improve the mechanisms for protecting intellectual rights, among which one of the most effective is confiscation. The purpose of the study is to explore the existing problems of criminal law and administrative law confiscation as a special feature of the protection of intellectual property rights. Key research methods include dialectical analysis, which helped obtain the most objective information about problematic processes and phenomena related to confiscation as a special feature of intellectual property protection, and deduction and induction, used to examine regulations. The paper analyses the state of legal protection of intellectual property rights and measures taken by the state to reform the intellectual property system. Attention is drawn to the fact that public relations in the studied area relate to criminal and administrative legal mechanisms related to confiscation. It is noted that depending on the violated regulation, criminal or administrative confiscation is applied to the violator. The paper analyses Ukrainian and foreign regulations that focus on one of the types of ensuring intellectual property rights – confiscation as a special feature of protecting intellectual property rights. Certain shortcomings of the Ukrainian legislation are noted, and it is proposed to make changes to it. Circumstances that motivate the examination of the legislative reflection of confiscation as a special feature of intellectual property protection are outlined. The findings of the study can be utilised by lawyers and officials of law enforcement and other state bodies responsible for confiscation measures directly related to the protection of intellectual property rights. Individual conclusions can serve as a basis for further research on confiscation as a special feature of the protection of intellectual property rights, and proposals can serve to improve the relevant legislation
没收是保护知识产权的特殊标志
尽管乌克兰拥有知识产权领域的立法框架,但一些问题仍未得到解决,尤其是必须完善知识产权保护机制,其中最有效的机制之一就是没收。本研究旨在探讨作为知识产权保护特色的刑法没收和行政法没收存在的问题。主要研究方法包括辩证分析法和演绎归纳法,前者有助于获取与作为知识产权保护特色的没收相关的问题过程和现象的最客观信息,后者则用于研究规章制度。本文分析了知识产权的法律保护状况以及国家为改革知识产权制度所采取的措施。本文提请注意,所研究领域的公共关系涉及与没收有关的刑事和行政法律机制。本文指出,根据违反的规定,对违反者实施刑事或行政没收。本文分析了乌克兰和外国的相关法规,其重点是确保知识产权的类型之一--没收作为保护知识产权的一个特殊特征。本文指出了乌克兰法律的某些不足之处,并建议对其进行修改。概述了促使对没收作为知识产权保护的一个特点进行立法反思的各种情况。本研究的结论可供负责没收措施的律师、执法官员和其他与知识产权保护直接相关的国家机构使用。个别结论可作为进一步研究没收作为知识产权保护的一个特征的基础,而建议则可用于完善相关立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信