Effective regulatory frameworks for constructive journalism: a study of China’s media systems

Gopolang Ditlhokwa, Sarah Marjorey Kisakye, John Demuyakor, Sampson Hodor
{"title":"Effective regulatory frameworks for constructive journalism: a study of China’s media systems","authors":"Gopolang Ditlhokwa, Sarah Marjorey Kisakye, John Demuyakor, Sampson Hodor","doi":"10.31763/ijcs.v5i1.625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Journalism practice in China is unique and different from the rest of the other countries in the world. Many scholars have attributed this to the effective regulatory systems and the structure of the media system thus the six forces controlling media space in China. This study adopted a qualitative condensed thematic analysis technique through in-depth interviews to examine how the regulatory framework in China affects the media ecosystem and constructive journalism practice. Through the snowball technique of sampling, the researchers collected data from fifteen (N=15) senior media professionals working within private and state-owned news outlets in China, to find answers to the nature of the media system in China and how this system has influenced and shaped constructive journalism practice during the COVID-19 pandemic between November and December 2021. One of the key findings of this study indicates that the robust media regulatory system practice in China has resulted in effective interactions among stakeholders, media houses, and journalists within the Chinese media system, which has significantly contributed to attaining effective constructive journalism practices. Again, our findings suggest that the effectiveness and constant interactions of the six forces of the Chinese media system have also helped enforce professionalism, dedication to duty, and patriotism among journalists and different media outlets in China. Finally, our study reveals that the Chinese Media giants such as China Global Television Network (CGTN), China Central Television (CCTV), and China Radio International (CRI) which serve millions of global audiences are very factual in their reportage. To avoid fake news in their reportage, CGTN and China Radio International, for instance, have designed specialized fact-checking programs for their news stories before airing them for public consumption.","PeriodicalId":171114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication and Society","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31763/ijcs.v5i1.625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Journalism practice in China is unique and different from the rest of the other countries in the world. Many scholars have attributed this to the effective regulatory systems and the structure of the media system thus the six forces controlling media space in China. This study adopted a qualitative condensed thematic analysis technique through in-depth interviews to examine how the regulatory framework in China affects the media ecosystem and constructive journalism practice. Through the snowball technique of sampling, the researchers collected data from fifteen (N=15) senior media professionals working within private and state-owned news outlets in China, to find answers to the nature of the media system in China and how this system has influenced and shaped constructive journalism practice during the COVID-19 pandemic between November and December 2021. One of the key findings of this study indicates that the robust media regulatory system practice in China has resulted in effective interactions among stakeholders, media houses, and journalists within the Chinese media system, which has significantly contributed to attaining effective constructive journalism practices. Again, our findings suggest that the effectiveness and constant interactions of the six forces of the Chinese media system have also helped enforce professionalism, dedication to duty, and patriotism among journalists and different media outlets in China. Finally, our study reveals that the Chinese Media giants such as China Global Television Network (CGTN), China Central Television (CCTV), and China Radio International (CRI) which serve millions of global audiences are very factual in their reportage. To avoid fake news in their reportage, CGTN and China Radio International, for instance, have designed specialized fact-checking programs for their news stories before airing them for public consumption.
建设性新闻报道的有效监管框架:中国媒体制度研究
中国的新闻实践独具特色,有别于世界其他国家。许多学者将其归因于有效的监管体系和媒体系统结构,从而形成了控制中国媒体空间的六种力量。本研究采用定性浓缩主题分析技术,通过深度访谈来研究中国的监管框架如何影响媒体生态系统和建设性新闻实践。通过 "滚雪球 "式的抽样技术,研究人员收集了 15 位(N=15)在中国民营和国有新闻机构工作的资深媒体专业人士的数据,以寻找中国传媒系统的性质以及该系统在 2021 年 11 月至 12 月 COVID-19 大流行期间如何影响和塑造建设性新闻实践的答案。本研究的主要发现之一表明,中国健全的媒体监管制度实践促成了中国传媒系统内利益相关者、媒体机构和记者之间的有效互动,这极大地促进了建设性新闻实践的有效实现。同样,我们的研究结果表明,中国传媒体系中六种力量的有效性和持续互动也有助于在中国记者和不同媒体机构中弘扬专业精神、敬业精神和爱国主义精神。最后,我们的研究显示,中国的媒体巨头,如中国环球电视网(CGTN)、中国中央电视台(CCTV)和中国国际广播电台(CRI)等,服务于全球数百万受众,他们的报道非常注重事实。为了避免在报道中出现假新闻,CGTN 和中国国际广播电台等在新闻报道播出前都设计了专门的事实核查程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信