Efficiency of a food supplement containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture in the diet of broiler chickens

IF 0.5 Q4 BIOLOGY
J. M. Poberezhets, V. M. Yaropud, I. Kupchuk, A. V. Kolechko, V. S. Rutkevych, V. F. Hraniak, S. A. Burlaka, О. V. Voitsitskyi
{"title":"Efficiency of a food supplement containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture in the diet of broiler chickens","authors":"J. M. Poberezhets, V. M. Yaropud, I. Kupchuk, A. V. Kolechko, V. S. Rutkevych, V. F. Hraniak, S. A. Burlaka, О. V. Voitsitskyi","doi":"10.15421/10.15421/022352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, high productivity parameters in poultry farming are achievable only by maximum fulfillment of the poultry’s biological needs, because only healthy and highly productive birds can be the basis of the sphere’s profitability. All this is closely associated with the usage of feed additives of natural origin and effective methods of poultry farming, which provide high productivity and natural resistance of a bird’s body. In the experiment, we examined the effects of a probiotic feed additive on the productivity and slaughter parameters of the broiler chickens. Intake of the feed supplement by the experimental-group broiler chickens increased their live weight by 5% at the age of 28 days, 12% at the age of 35 days, and by 14% at the age of 42 days, compared with the control group. Using the tested probiotic feed supplement in the diet increased the mean daily (by 15.9%) and absolute increments (by 14.4% compared with the control group). Intake of the probiotic feed supplement by broiler chickens of the experimental group increased their pre-slaughter live weight by 14.2%, weight of non-processed carcasses by 15.5%, semi-processed carcass by 15.7% and processed carcass by 15.3%, compared with the parameters of the control group. In broilers of the experimental group, there were increases in the general weight of muscles (10.3%), namely the breast muscles (11.8%), muscles of thighs and lower legs (9.8%), and weight of the gizzard (by 6.5%), compared with the control group. Intake of the probiotic supplement by the experimental-group broiler chickens resulted in increases in width of the proventriculus (28.5%), length of the gizzard (16.3%) and width of the gizzard (29.7%), compared with the control group of animals. The probiotic feed supplement increased the length of the duodenum (by 7.6%) and the jejunum (by 4.5%) in the experimental-group broiler chickens, against the control. Therefore, feed supplements based on cheap culture Saccharomyces cerevisiae are promising, because they are able to enhance the effectiveness of poultry farming at relatively small costs.","PeriodicalId":21094,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems","volume":"2009 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/10.15421/022352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, high productivity parameters in poultry farming are achievable only by maximum fulfillment of the poultry’s biological needs, because only healthy and highly productive birds can be the basis of the sphere’s profitability. All this is closely associated with the usage of feed additives of natural origin and effective methods of poultry farming, which provide high productivity and natural resistance of a bird’s body. In the experiment, we examined the effects of a probiotic feed additive on the productivity and slaughter parameters of the broiler chickens. Intake of the feed supplement by the experimental-group broiler chickens increased their live weight by 5% at the age of 28 days, 12% at the age of 35 days, and by 14% at the age of 42 days, compared with the control group. Using the tested probiotic feed supplement in the diet increased the mean daily (by 15.9%) and absolute increments (by 14.4% compared with the control group). Intake of the probiotic feed supplement by broiler chickens of the experimental group increased their pre-slaughter live weight by 14.2%, weight of non-processed carcasses by 15.5%, semi-processed carcass by 15.7% and processed carcass by 15.3%, compared with the parameters of the control group. In broilers of the experimental group, there were increases in the general weight of muscles (10.3%), namely the breast muscles (11.8%), muscles of thighs and lower legs (9.8%), and weight of the gizzard (by 6.5%), compared with the control group. Intake of the probiotic supplement by the experimental-group broiler chickens resulted in increases in width of the proventriculus (28.5%), length of the gizzard (16.3%) and width of the gizzard (29.7%), compared with the control group of animals. The probiotic feed supplement increased the length of the duodenum (by 7.6%) and the jejunum (by 4.5%) in the experimental-group broiler chickens, against the control. Therefore, feed supplements based on cheap culture Saccharomyces cerevisiae are promising, because they are able to enhance the effectiveness of poultry farming at relatively small costs.
在肉鸡日粮中添加含有酵母菌培养物的食物补充剂的效率
目前,只有最大限度地满足家禽的生理需求,才能实现家禽养殖业的高生产力参数,因为只有健康和高生产力的家禽才能成为该领域盈利的基础。所有这一切都与使用天然饲料添加剂和有效的家禽养殖方法密切相关,它们能提供高生产力和家禽身体的天然抵抗力。在实验中,我们研究了益生菌饲料添加剂对肉鸡生产率和屠宰参数的影响。与对照组相比,实验组肉鸡摄入饲料添加剂后,28 日龄的活重增加了 5%,35 日龄的活重增加了 12%,42 日龄的活重增加了 14%。与对照组相比,在日粮中添加试验益生菌饲料增重剂提高了平均日增重(15.9%)和绝对增重(14.4%)。与对照组的参数相比,实验组肉鸡摄入益生菌饲料添加剂后,宰前活重增加了 14.2%,非加工胴体重量增加了 15.5%,半加工胴体重量增加了 15.7%,加工胴体重量增加了 15.3%。与对照组相比,实验组肉鸡的肌肉总重量增加了 10.3%,即胸肌增加了 11.8%,大腿和小腿肌肉增加了 9.8%,胗的重量增加了 6.5%。与对照组相比,实验组肉鸡摄入益生菌补充剂后,胃窦宽度(28.5%)、胗长(16.3%)和胗宽(29.7%)均有所增加。与对照组相比,益生菌饲料添加剂增加了实验组肉鸡十二指肠的长度(7.6%)和空肠的长度(4.5%)。因此,以廉价培养的酿酒酵母为基础的饲料添加剂很有前景,因为它们能以相对较低的成本提高家禽养殖的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信