Minimally Invasive Quadriceps vs Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Review

Benha Journal of Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.21608/bjas.2023.223680.1207

Mohamed Salah Addin Shawky, Elsayed Mahmoud Bayomy, Mohammed Ahmed Abdallah Mohamed Gharib

{"title":"Minimally Invasive Quadriceps vs Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Review","authors":"Mohamed Salah Addin Shawky, Elsayed Mahmoud Bayomy, Mohammed Ahmed Abdallah Mohamed Gharib","doi":"10.21608/bjas.2023.223680.1207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure for individuals with ACL injuries. The choice of graft material is crucial for the success of the surgery, with minimally invasive quadriceps tendon autografts and hamstring tendon autografts being the most frequently used options. Objective: This comparative review aims to analyze and compare the outcomes of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using minimally invasive quadriceps tendon autografts and hamstring tendon autografts. The objective is to provide valuable insights into the advantages, limitations, and clinical efficacy of each graft option. Conclusions: Both minimally invasive quadriceps tendon autografts and hamstring tendon autografts have demonstrated positive outcomes in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Each graft option has its own advantages and limitations, such as graft strength, harvest site morbidity, postoperative pain, and recovery time. Surgeons and patients can use this information to make informed decisions regarding graft selection in ACL reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":8745,"journal":{"name":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.223680.1207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure for individuals with ACL injuries. The choice of graft material is crucial for the success of the surgery, with minimally invasive quadriceps tendon autografts and hamstring tendon autografts being the most frequently used options. Objective: This comparative review aims to analyze and compare the outcomes of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using minimally invasive quadriceps tendon autografts and hamstring tendon autografts. The objective is to provide valuable insights into the advantages, limitations, and clinical efficacy of each graft option. Conclusions: Both minimally invasive quadriceps tendon autografts and hamstring tendon autografts have demonstrated positive outcomes in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Each graft option has its own advantages and limitations, such as graft strength, harvest site morbidity, postoperative pain, and recovery time. Surgeons and patients can use this information to make informed decisions regarding graft selection in ACL reconstruction.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关节镜前交叉韧带重建术中的微创股四头肌与腘绳肌肌腱自体移植物：比较综述

背景：关节镜下前交叉韧带（ACL）重建术是治疗前交叉韧带损伤患者的常用手术。移植材料的选择对手术的成功至关重要，微创股四头肌腱自体移植和腘绳肌腱自体移植是最常用的选择。目的：本对比性综述旨在分析和比较使用微创股四头肌肌腱自体移植物和腘绳肌肌腱自体移植物进行关节镜前交叉韧带重建的结果。其目的是就每种移植物方案的优势、局限性和临床疗效提供有价值的见解。结论：微创股四头肌肌腱自体移植物和腘绳肌肌腱自体移植物在关节镜前交叉韧带重建中都取得了积极的疗效。每种移植物都有其自身的优势和局限性，如移植物的强度、采集部位的发病率、术后疼痛和恢复时间。外科医生和患者可以利用这些信息就前交叉韧带重建中的移植物选择做出明智的决定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Benha Journal of Applied Sciences

自引率

0.00%

发文量