Comparison of the Accuracy of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid, Visual Inspection with Lugol Iodine and coloscope in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia

Seham Al Berry, T. Assar, Ahmed Suliman, Mona Gohary
{"title":"Comparison of the Accuracy of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid, Visual Inspection with Lugol Iodine and coloscope in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia","authors":"Seham Al Berry, T. Assar, Ahmed Suliman, Mona Gohary","doi":"10.21608/bjas.2023.218636.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cervix cancer is a main cause of illness and death globally among women. It is the second most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in women. To combat the condition, it is necessary to create a screening test with high specificity and sensitivity. Aim of the Work: to compare Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid, Visual Inspection with Lugol Iodine and colposcope Accuracy in Cervical Neoplasia Screening. Patients and Methods: This study is a Cross-sectional study this study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynecology department at Benha University hospitals. The study period was carried out from February 2022 to January 2023. Results: In the current study, the mean age was 38.93±7.2 years and the most common age category was 40-50 years in 25 (38.5%) patients. In the present study, most of the studied cases 58 (89.2%) were House wife, only 4(6.2%) cases were nurse and 3 (4.6%) were Teacher. As regard to contraception, the most common Contraception used was IUCD in 34 (52.3%), then 8 (12.3%) cases used Cocs, 4(6.2%) cases used Pops and also tubal ligation, 3 (4.6%) cases used DMPA. As regard to symptoms, there were 37 (56.9%) suffer from bleeding, 47 (72.3%) cases had positive Discharge, 43 (66.2%) cases had pain. In the present study, there were 19(29.2%) cases had abnormal VIA and 46 (70.8%) cases were normal, there were 19(29.2%) cases had abnormal VILI and 46 (70.8%) cases were normal and there were 34(52.3%) cases had abnormal Colposcope and 31 (47.7%) cases were normal. By biopsy there were 32(49.2%) cases had abnormal Biopsy and 33 (50.8%) cases were normal Conclusion: The saying “preventable but not prevented\" still applies to cervical cancer because there are currently no screening methods that are 100% sensitive and have good specificity . As a result, in the current study, an effort has been made to assess the colposcopy, VILI and VIA both separately and compined.","PeriodicalId":8745,"journal":{"name":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","volume":"308 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.218636.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervix cancer is a main cause of illness and death globally among women. It is the second most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in women. To combat the condition, it is necessary to create a screening test with high specificity and sensitivity. Aim of the Work: to compare Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid, Visual Inspection with Lugol Iodine and colposcope Accuracy in Cervical Neoplasia Screening. Patients and Methods: This study is a Cross-sectional study this study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynecology department at Benha University hospitals. The study period was carried out from February 2022 to January 2023. Results: In the current study, the mean age was 38.93±7.2 years and the most common age category was 40-50 years in 25 (38.5%) patients. In the present study, most of the studied cases 58 (89.2%) were House wife, only 4(6.2%) cases were nurse and 3 (4.6%) were Teacher. As regard to contraception, the most common Contraception used was IUCD in 34 (52.3%), then 8 (12.3%) cases used Cocs, 4(6.2%) cases used Pops and also tubal ligation, 3 (4.6%) cases used DMPA. As regard to symptoms, there were 37 (56.9%) suffer from bleeding, 47 (72.3%) cases had positive Discharge, 43 (66.2%) cases had pain. In the present study, there were 19(29.2%) cases had abnormal VIA and 46 (70.8%) cases were normal, there were 19(29.2%) cases had abnormal VILI and 46 (70.8%) cases were normal and there were 34(52.3%) cases had abnormal Colposcope and 31 (47.7%) cases were normal. By biopsy there were 32(49.2%) cases had abnormal Biopsy and 33 (50.8%) cases were normal Conclusion: The saying “preventable but not prevented" still applies to cervical cancer because there are currently no screening methods that are 100% sensitive and have good specificity . As a result, in the current study, an effort has been made to assess the colposcopy, VILI and VIA both separately and compined.
醋酸目视检查、卢戈尔碘目视检查和阴道镜在筛查宫颈肿瘤中的准确性比较
背景:宫颈癌是全球妇女患病和死亡的主要原因。它是第二大流行癌症,也是妇女因癌症死亡的主要原因。为了防治这种疾病,有必要建立一种特异性和灵敏度都很高的筛查测试。工作目的:比较醋酸肉眼检查、卢戈尔碘肉眼检查和阴道镜在宫颈肿瘤筛查中的准确性。患者和方法:本研究是一项横断面研究,在本哈大学医院妇产科进行。研究时间为 2022 年 2 月至 2023 年 1 月。研究结果在本次研究中,患者的平均年龄为(38.93±7.2)岁,最常见的年龄段为 40-50 岁,占 25 例(38.5%)。在本次研究中,58 例(89.2%)研究病例中的大多数人是家庭主妇,只有 4 例(6.2%)是护士,3 例(4.6%)是教师。在避孕措施方面,34 例(52.3%)最常用的避孕措施是宫内节育器,8 例(12.3%)使用可克丝,4 例(6.2%)使用 Pops 和输卵管结扎,3 例(4.6%)使用 DMPA。在症状方面,37 例(56.9%)有出血,47 例(72.3%)有阳性分泌物,43 例(66.2%)有疼痛。本研究中,19 例(29.2%)VIA 异常,46 例(70.8%)正常;19 例(29.2%)VILI 异常,46 例(70.8%)正常;34 例(52.3%)阴道镜异常,31 例(47.7%)正常。活组织检查方面,32 例(49.2%)活组织检查异常,33 例(50.8%)正常:宫颈癌 "可防不可治 "的说法仍然适用,因为目前还没有敏感性和特异性都达到 100% 的筛查方法。因此,本研究对阴道镜检查、VILI 和 VIA 进行了单独和综合评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信