Regarding the issue of special import of goods for military purpose and dual use as items seized or restricted in civilian circulation

Yuliia Petronchak, Khrystyna Romaniv
{"title":"Regarding the issue of special import of goods for military purpose and dual use as items seized or restricted in civilian circulation","authors":"Yuliia Petronchak, Khrystyna Romaniv","doi":"10.32518/sals3.2023.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study is stipulated by the urgent need to urgently fill the suddenly emerging legal gaps caused by the expansion of the powers of non-governmental organizations that have been actively involved in the process of assisting combatants. The study aims to solve an important pragmatic problem: to ensure legal harmonization of procurement with the highest productivity and lowest legal and financial risks. The study uses a synthesis of general scientific, legal and sociological-legal approaches, methods, and techniques of scientific knowledge. As a result of the work carried out, the author managed to rethink the legal status of things as objects of civil rights in the light of the latest military realities. The legal algorithm of procurement of military and dual-use goods by non-governmental organizations is clarified; a parallel is drawn with the procurement procedure carried out by the relevant state-owned enterprises. The author comprehends the phenomenon of a trade mission in general and a trade mission burdened with a foreign element in the field of foreign economic activity in particular. The author analyses the conflict of laws clauses which can resolve the contradictions of counterparties in an international sale and purchase agreement. The author suggests ways for further scientific research in this area of research. The author structures the mechanism by which representatives of the public sector, including charitable organizations and foundations, may obtain licences for the purchase of military and dual-use goods for the army. It is argued that in practice, since the beginning of hostilities, these organizations, and foundations have been creating a worthy alternative to the State defence sector. These developments, in addition to their pragmatic significance, are also characterized by a certain theoretical significance, since they can be used for scientific research and solving problems in the field of property rights, the law of non-governmental organizations, foreign economic activity, as well as for developing and improving training courses in the field of civil, humanitarian and international law.","PeriodicalId":344341,"journal":{"name":"Social Legal Studios","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Legal Studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32518/sals3.2023.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study is stipulated by the urgent need to urgently fill the suddenly emerging legal gaps caused by the expansion of the powers of non-governmental organizations that have been actively involved in the process of assisting combatants. The study aims to solve an important pragmatic problem: to ensure legal harmonization of procurement with the highest productivity and lowest legal and financial risks. The study uses a synthesis of general scientific, legal and sociological-legal approaches, methods, and techniques of scientific knowledge. As a result of the work carried out, the author managed to rethink the legal status of things as objects of civil rights in the light of the latest military realities. The legal algorithm of procurement of military and dual-use goods by non-governmental organizations is clarified; a parallel is drawn with the procurement procedure carried out by the relevant state-owned enterprises. The author comprehends the phenomenon of a trade mission in general and a trade mission burdened with a foreign element in the field of foreign economic activity in particular. The author analyses the conflict of laws clauses which can resolve the contradictions of counterparties in an international sale and purchase agreement. The author suggests ways for further scientific research in this area of research. The author structures the mechanism by which representatives of the public sector, including charitable organizations and foundations, may obtain licences for the purchase of military and dual-use goods for the army. It is argued that in practice, since the beginning of hostilities, these organizations, and foundations have been creating a worthy alternative to the State defence sector. These developments, in addition to their pragmatic significance, are also characterized by a certain theoretical significance, since they can be used for scientific research and solving problems in the field of property rights, the law of non-governmental organizations, foreign economic activity, as well as for developing and improving training courses in the field of civil, humanitarian and international law.
关于作为在民间流通中扣押或限制的物品的军事目的和双重用途物品的特殊进口问题
本研究之所以具有现实意义,是因为迫切需要填补因积极参与援助战斗人员进程的非政 府组织权力扩大而突然出现的法律空白。本研究旨在解决一个重要的实际问题:确保采购工作在法律上的协调统一,以达到最高的生 产率和最低的法律与财务风险。本研究综合运用了一般科学、法律和社会学-法律方法、手段和科学知识技术。由于所开展的工作,作者得以根据最新的军事现实重新思考作为公民权利客体的物的法律地位。澄清了非政府组织采购军事和军民两用产品的法律算法,并将其与相关国有企业的采购程序相提并论。作者理解了一般贸易代表团的现象,特别是对外经济活动领域中带有外国因素的贸易代表团。作者分析了可以解决国际买卖协议中交易方矛盾的法律冲突条款。作者提出了在这一研究领域开展进一步科学研究的方法。作者构建了公共部门代表(包括慈善组织和基金会)为军队购买军事和军民两用产品获得许可的机制。作者认为,在实践中,自敌对行动开始以来,这些组织和基金会一直在为国家防务部门创造一个有价值的替代选择。这些发展除了具有实用意义外,还具有一定的理论意义,因为它们可用于科学研究和解决产权、非政府组织法、对外经济活动领域的问题,以及制定和改进民法、人道主义法和国际法领域的培训课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信