Kerja Dakwah dan Kerja Ilmiah-Positivistik dalam Konteks Pendidikan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam: Titik-Jumpa dan Titik-Pisah

Refleksi Pub Date : 2023-08-28 DOI:10.15408/ref.v22i1.32589
Media Zainul Bahri
{"title":"Kerja Dakwah dan Kerja Ilmiah-Positivistik dalam Konteks Pendidikan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam: Titik-Jumpa dan Titik-Pisah","authors":"Media Zainul Bahri","doi":"10.15408/ref.v22i1.32589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article elucidates two main points. First, the difference between da’wah (Islamic preaching) activities and scientific-positivistic works. Da’wah, for example, is a theological work. To preach is to Invite/to call people to strengthen their beliefs and faith, do good, avoid bad deeds, and in many cases, preaching is to make judgments: right and wrong, misguidance or faith. Conversely, positivistic-scientific work is a scientific activity with methodological tools: there is empirical data (primary and secondary), there are approaches and theories, there are logical and rational explanations, and instead to strengthen belief and faith, scientific work is to find “scientific truth”. There are ontological, epistemological and objective differences between da’wah activities and scientific-positivistic ways. Second, to this day there is still a big problem related to Indonesian State Islamic University or Indonesian State Islamic Institute (UIN/IAIN): is this institution is a da’wah institution because there is an “Islam” within, or a scientific educational institution one because it is also a university that demands a scientific-positivistic ways. This article uses historical, theological and philosophical approaches.","PeriodicalId":53314,"journal":{"name":"Refleksi","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refleksi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v22i1.32589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article elucidates two main points. First, the difference between da’wah (Islamic preaching) activities and scientific-positivistic works. Da’wah, for example, is a theological work. To preach is to Invite/to call people to strengthen their beliefs and faith, do good, avoid bad deeds, and in many cases, preaching is to make judgments: right and wrong, misguidance or faith. Conversely, positivistic-scientific work is a scientific activity with methodological tools: there is empirical data (primary and secondary), there are approaches and theories, there are logical and rational explanations, and instead to strengthen belief and faith, scientific work is to find “scientific truth”. There are ontological, epistemological and objective differences between da’wah activities and scientific-positivistic ways. Second, to this day there is still a big problem related to Indonesian State Islamic University or Indonesian State Islamic Institute (UIN/IAIN): is this institution is a da’wah institution because there is an “Islam” within, or a scientific educational institution one because it is also a university that demands a scientific-positivistic ways. This article uses historical, theological and philosophical approaches.
伊斯兰高等教育背景下的 "达瓦 "工作与科学-实证主义工作:交汇点与分离点
本文阐述了两个要点。第一,"达瓦"(伊斯兰传教)活动与科学实证主义著作之间的区别。例如,"达瓦 "是一项神学工作。宣讲就是邀请/号召人们加强信仰和信念,行善积德,避免做坏事,在很多情况下,宣讲就是做出判断:对与错、误导或信仰。相反,实证主义-科学工作是一种科学活动,有方法论工具:有经验数据(主要和次要),有方法和理论,有逻辑和理性解释,而不是为了加强信仰和信念,科学工作是为了找到 "科学真理"。达瓦活动与科学实证主义方式存在本体论、认识论和客观上的差异。其次,时至今日,印尼国立伊斯兰大学或印尼国立伊斯兰学院(UIN/IAIN)仍然存在一个很大的问题:这所机构究竟是一个 "达瓦 "机构,因为其中有 "伊斯兰";还是一个科学教育机构,因为它也是一所要求以科学-实证主义方式办学的大学。本文采用了历史、神学和哲学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信