Liberal Democracy is not Democracy: Neoclassicism Politics Perspectives

Innovations Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.54882/7420237411052
Pelekeh H. Tapang
{"title":"Liberal Democracy is not Democracy: Neoclassicism Politics Perspectives","authors":"Pelekeh H. Tapang","doi":"10.54882/7420237411052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much work has been done to lucubrate divergence between democracy and liberal democracy. Despite this, scholarships have failed to convey that these are two distinct ideologies. This paper challenge the fundamental proposition that, democracy is synonymous to liberal democracy. The work delves into individualism, rights, media, and protection of minorities. This paper thereby, explore the differences between the two concepts, first, in principles, and second, in practice. Empirical examples provided offer a posteriori aid to enforce assertions that democracy, when infused with liberal tenets, forms a novel governance system - liberal democracy.","PeriodicalId":80004,"journal":{"name":"Innovations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54882/7420237411052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much work has been done to lucubrate divergence between democracy and liberal democracy. Despite this, scholarships have failed to convey that these are two distinct ideologies. This paper challenge the fundamental proposition that, democracy is synonymous to liberal democracy. The work delves into individualism, rights, media, and protection of minorities. This paper thereby, explore the differences between the two concepts, first, in principles, and second, in practice. Empirical examples provided offer a posteriori aid to enforce assertions that democracy, when infused with liberal tenets, forms a novel governance system - liberal democracy.
自由民主不是民主新古典主义政治学视角
在阐明民主与自由民主之间的分歧方面,已经做了大量工作。尽管如此,学术界仍未能阐明这是两种截然不同的意识形态。本文对 "民主就是自由民主的同义词 "这一基本命题提出了质疑。作品深入探讨了个人主义、权利、媒体和对少数群体的保护。因此,本文首先探讨了这两个概念在原则上的差异,其次探讨了它们在实践中的差异。本文所提供的经验性实例提供了一种后验式的帮助,以证实以下论断:当民主注入自由主义信条时,就会形成一种新的治理体系--自由民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信