Exploring Judicial Interpretation: Comparative Law Methodology and the Hybridisation Paradigm

Q2 Social Sciences

Global Jurist Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1515/gj-2023-0119

Caterina Bergomi

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) interprets directives and regulations, forming what will be called a hybrid space where national legal systems and supranational elements converge, particularly when asserting the autonomy of a notion. Comparative law has supported legal norm harmonisation but has also revealed the diversity within legal systems, including the EU’s, through the study of legal formants. The goal of this contribution is to show how a comparative approach, incorporating the concept of hybridity from other disciplines, can aid in analysing autonomous interpretation and the influence of hybridisation on legal concepts and terminology.

查看原文本刊更多论文

探索司法解释：比较法方法论与混合范式

摘要欧洲联盟法院（CJEU）对指令和法规进行解释，形成了一个被称为混合空间的地方，国家法律体系和超国家因素在此交汇，尤其是在主张概念自治时。比较法支持法律规范的统一，但也通过对法律形式的研究揭示了包括欧盟在内的法律体系内部的多样性。这篇论文的目的在于说明比较法如何结合其他学科的混合概念，帮助分析自主解释以及混合对法律概念和术语的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Global Jurist Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Jurist offers a forum for scholarly cyber-debate on issues of comparative law, law and economics, international law, law and society, and legal anthropology. Edited by an international board of leading comparative law scholars from all the continents, Global Jurist is mindful of globalization and respectful of cultural differences. We will develop a truly international community of legal scholars where linguistic and cultural barriers are overcome and legal issues are finally discussed outside of the narrow limits imposed by positivism, parochialism, ethnocentrism, imperialism and chauvinism in the law. Submission is welcome from all over the world and particularly encouraged from the Global South.