A Scientometric Analysis of the most Highly Cited Publications on Fracture Research from India: 1989–2022

Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India) Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1775600

Raju Vaishya, Brij Mohan Gupta, Mallikarjun Kappi, A. Vaish

{"title":"A Scientometric Analysis of the most Highly Cited Publications on Fracture Research from India: 1989–2022","authors":"Raju Vaishya, Brij Mohan Gupta, Mallikarjun Kappi, A. Vaish","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background India bears a huge burden of accidents and fractures. This study aimed to study the bibliometric characteristics of India's fracture research output during last three decades. The most highly cited publications (HCPs; with 20 or more citations) on orthopaedic fracture research from India were analyzed on various parameters. Methodology The Scopus database was used to identify publications on fractures that originated from India, between 1989 to 2022. The top HCPs were retrieved. A bibliometric and network analysis was used to identify the key players, such as organizations, authors and journals, and important keywords besides identifying their collaborative interactions and visual co-occurrences of significant keywords using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny software. Results Of the total 1,048 Indian publications, 126 (10.02%) were HCPs (cited 4,695 times). External funding was received in 1.59%, and international collaboration in 15.08%. The most productive organizations were All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, followed by Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, and Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak. The most impactful organizations were Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC), Delhi, followed by the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, and Sancheti Institute of Orthopaedic Research & Rehabilitation, Pune. The most productive authors were R. Malhotra, M.S. Dhillon, and N.K. Magu, and the most impactful authors were U.K. Meena, A.P. Singh, and P. Sancheti. Delhi was the epic of research, followed by Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Chandigarh. Conclusion This study provides an insight into the research trends, the most influential contributions, and the performance of Indian organizations and authors. It gives some ideas about the past, present, and future hotspots in research.","PeriodicalId":505103,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background India bears a huge burden of accidents and fractures. This study aimed to study the bibliometric characteristics of India's fracture research output during last three decades. The most highly cited publications (HCPs; with 20 or more citations) on orthopaedic fracture research from India were analyzed on various parameters. Methodology The Scopus database was used to identify publications on fractures that originated from India, between 1989 to 2022. The top HCPs were retrieved. A bibliometric and network analysis was used to identify the key players, such as organizations, authors and journals, and important keywords besides identifying their collaborative interactions and visual co-occurrences of significant keywords using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny software. Results Of the total 1,048 Indian publications, 126 (10.02%) were HCPs (cited 4,695 times). External funding was received in 1.59%, and international collaboration in 15.08%. The most productive organizations were All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, followed by Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, and Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak. The most impactful organizations were Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC), Delhi, followed by the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, and Sancheti Institute of Orthopaedic Research & Rehabilitation, Pune. The most productive authors were R. Malhotra, M.S. Dhillon, and N.K. Magu, and the most impactful authors were U.K. Meena, A.P. Singh, and P. Sancheti. Delhi was the epic of research, followed by Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Chandigarh. Conclusion This study provides an insight into the research trends, the most influential contributions, and the performance of Indian organizations and authors. It gives some ideas about the past, present, and future hotspots in research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

印度断裂研究领域高被引论文的科学计量分析：1989-2022

摘要背景印度承受着巨大的事故和骨折负担。本研究旨在研究过去三十年中印度骨折研究成果的文献计量学特征。研究人员对印度骨科骨折研究中被引用次数最多的出版物（HCPs；被引用次数达到或超过 20 次）的各种参数进行了分析。方法使用 Scopus 数据库查找 1989 年至 2022 年间源自印度的有关骨折的出版物。检索了排名靠前的高级保健医生。使用 VOSviewer 和 Biblioshiny 软件进行文献计量学和网络分析，以确定关键参与者，如组织、作者和期刊，以及重要的关键词，此外还确定了他们之间的合作互动和重要关键词的可视共现。结果在总共 1,048 篇印度论文中，有 126 篇（10.02%）是人类保健论文（被引用 4,695 次）。1.59%的论文获得了外部资助，15.08%的论文获得了国际合作。成果最多的机构是新德里的全印度医学科学院（AIIMS），其次是昌迪加尔的医学教育与研究研究生院（PGIMER）和罗塔克的潘迪特-巴格瓦特-达亚尔-夏尔马医学研究生院（PGIMS）。最有影响力的机构是德里的毛拉纳-阿扎德医学院（MAMC），其次是朋迪切里的贾瓦哈拉尔医学研究生教育与研究院（JIPMER）和浦那的桑切蒂矫形研究与康复研究院。成果最多的作者是 R. Malhotra、M.S. Dhillon 和 N.K. Magu，影响最大的作者是 U.K. Meena、A.P. Singh 和 P. Sancheti。德里是研究的中心，其次是卡纳塔克邦、泰米尔纳德邦和昌迪加尔。结论本研究深入探讨了研究趋势、最有影响力的贡献以及印度组织和作者的业绩。它为过去、现在和未来的研究热点提供了一些思路。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India)

自引率

0.00%

发文量