Pemilihan Supplier Barang Elektrikal Dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus: PT Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras)

Andre Bayu Mahardika, Elly Ismiyah, Yanuar Pandu Negoro
{"title":"Pemilihan Supplier Barang Elektrikal Dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus: PT Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras)","authors":"Andre Bayu Mahardika, Elly Ismiyah, Yanuar Pandu Negoro","doi":"10.32672/jse.v8i4.5754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PT. Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras is a corporate entity within the business sector that operates specifically within the service industry. The successful operation of trade is contingent upon the presence of adequate assistance. Nevertheless, the firm has some challenges, particularly in the domain of electrical products procurement. Delays in the delivery of electrical goods from suppliers, specifically PT. X, PT. Y, and PT. Z, impedes the operational workflows of the company. The study employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology to conduct the research. This involved constructing a hierarchical or network structure of the problem and conducting a pairwise comparison stage afterward. The findings reveal the key factors that significantly impact the supplier selection process for electrical items at PT. Petrokopindo established a prioritization framework, wherein quality criteria were assigned the greatest weight of 45.6%. This was followed by pricing criteria, which were assigned a weight of 30.3%. The third priority was given to delivery criteria, with a weight of 14.6%. Lastly, payment criteria were assigned the lowest priority, with a weight of 9.4%. PT Z holds the highest weight, specifically 35.2%, in relation to suppliers who demonstrate exceptional performance in terms of pricing criterion, carrying a weight of 20.6%. The supplier PT. The provider PT Y achieved the least outcome, with an overall weight value of 9.3%, while the lowest weight recorded was 3.8%.","PeriodicalId":17758,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Serambi Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Serambi Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v8i4.5754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PT. Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras is a corporate entity within the business sector that operates specifically within the service industry. The successful operation of trade is contingent upon the presence of adequate assistance. Nevertheless, the firm has some challenges, particularly in the domain of electrical products procurement. Delays in the delivery of electrical goods from suppliers, specifically PT. X, PT. Y, and PT. Z, impedes the operational workflows of the company. The study employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology to conduct the research. This involved constructing a hierarchical or network structure of the problem and conducting a pairwise comparison stage afterward. The findings reveal the key factors that significantly impact the supplier selection process for electrical items at PT. Petrokopindo established a prioritization framework, wherein quality criteria were assigned the greatest weight of 45.6%. This was followed by pricing criteria, which were assigned a weight of 30.3%. The third priority was given to delivery criteria, with a weight of 14.6%. Lastly, payment criteria were assigned the lowest priority, with a weight of 9.4%. PT Z holds the highest weight, specifically 35.2%, in relation to suppliers who demonstrate exceptional performance in terms of pricing criterion, carrying a weight of 20.6%. The supplier PT. The provider PT Y achieved the least outcome, with an overall weight value of 9.3%, while the lowest weight recorded was 3.8%.
使用 AHP 方法选择电器供应商(案例研究:PT Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras)
PT.Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras 是一家专门从事服务业的商业实体。贸易的成功运作取决于是否有足够的援助。然而,该公司也面临着一些挑战,尤其是在电气产品采购方面。供应商(特别是 PT.X、PT.Y 和 PT.Z)的电气产品交货延迟,阻碍了公司的业务工作流程。本研究采用层次分析法(AHP)进行研究。这包括构建问题的层次或网络结构,然后进行配对比较。研究结果揭示了对 PT.Petrokopindo 建立了一个优先排序框架,其中质量标准的权重最大,占 45.6%。其次是价格标准,权重为 30.3%。交付标准的权重为 14.6%,排在第三位。最后,付款标准的优先级最低,权重为 9.4%。PT Z 的权重最高,为 35.2%,而在定价标准方面表现优异的供应商的权重为 20.6%。供应商 PT.供应商 PT.Y 的成果最少,总权重值为 9.3%,最低权重值为 3.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信