Hospital Cost vs INA-CBGs Claim for Obstetrics Procedure In Soe Rural General Hospital, East Nusa Tenggara

Q4 Medicine
Raymond Surya, Ascobat Gani, Y. B. Saroyo
{"title":"Hospital Cost vs INA-CBGs Claim for Obstetrics Procedure In Soe Rural General Hospital, East Nusa Tenggara","authors":"Raymond Surya, Ascobat Gani, Y. B. Saroyo","doi":"10.32771/inajog.v11i4.2010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:  To depict the discrepancy and analyze the difference between hospital cost and INA-CBGs claim in obstetrics’ cases in SoE Rural General Hospital, Timor Tengah Selatan regent, East Nusa Tenggara. Methods: This is an observational descriptive study using medical record documents of spontaneous vaginal, assisted vaginal, and cesarean delivery cases from the period of October to December 2022. We included all completed billing documents on that period. Cases paid by fee-for-service and local government were excluded. Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistic 23.0 Results: From the total of 323 delivery cases recorded in SoE Rural General Hospital, only 245 cases were included. Most subjects were patients aged around 30 years old, referred from primary healthcare facility in the district, were in term pregnancy, and in 3rd class inpatient rooms. The median of length of stay (LOS) in vaginal delivery (spontaneous and assisted) and cesarean delivery were 2 days and 3 days, respectively. Mean difference between hospital cost to INA-CBGs claim was 67% to 158% for either vaginal or cesarean delivery based on class inpatient room. We found that hospital cost was always higher than claim cost based on INA-CBGs claim. Conclusion: There is a significant discrepancy between hospital cost and INA-CBGs claim (from 67% to 158%) for obstetric services in SoE Rural General Hospital. Keywords: hospital cost, INA-CBGs claim, obstetric.   Abstrak Tujuan: Untuk memberikan gambaran perbedaan dan menganalisis perbedaan antara tarif RS dengan klaim INA-CBGs pada kasus obstetrik di RSUD SoE, Timor Tengah Selatan, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Metode: Studi deskriptif observasional menggunakan dokumen rekam medis dari kasus persalinan pervaginam spontan, persalinan pervaginam dengan alat, dan seksio sesarea dari Oktober hinga Desember 2022. Kami memasukkan seluruh dokumen billing yang lengkap. Dokumen biling yang dibayarkan mandiri dan oleh pemerintah lokal dieskslusi. Analisis data dengan menggunakan IBM SPSS Statistik 23.0. Hasil: Dari 323 persalinan yang terekam di RSUD SoE, hanya 245 kasus diinklusikan. Kebanyakan subjek berusia 30 tahun, dirujuk dari puskesmas, kehamilan cukup bulan, dan ruang perawatan kelas 3. Angka median dari lama rawat pervaginam (baik spontan maupun dengan alat) adalah 2 hari dan seksio sesarea 3 hari. Rerata perbedaan tarif RS dengan klaim INA-CBGs ialah 67% hingga 158% baik persalinan pervaginam maupun seksio sesarea berdasarkan ruang kelas perawatan. Kami menemukan angka tarif RS selalu lebih tinggi cukup jauh dari klaim INA-CBGs. Kesimpulan: Terdapat perbedaan antara tarif RS dan klaim INA-CBGs (antara 67 hingga 158%) untuk prosedur obstetrik di RSUD SoE. Kata kunci: tarif RS, klaim INA-CBGs, obstetrik.","PeriodicalId":13477,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32771/inajog.v11i4.2010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  To depict the discrepancy and analyze the difference between hospital cost and INA-CBGs claim in obstetrics’ cases in SoE Rural General Hospital, Timor Tengah Selatan regent, East Nusa Tenggara. Methods: This is an observational descriptive study using medical record documents of spontaneous vaginal, assisted vaginal, and cesarean delivery cases from the period of October to December 2022. We included all completed billing documents on that period. Cases paid by fee-for-service and local government were excluded. Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistic 23.0 Results: From the total of 323 delivery cases recorded in SoE Rural General Hospital, only 245 cases were included. Most subjects were patients aged around 30 years old, referred from primary healthcare facility in the district, were in term pregnancy, and in 3rd class inpatient rooms. The median of length of stay (LOS) in vaginal delivery (spontaneous and assisted) and cesarean delivery were 2 days and 3 days, respectively. Mean difference between hospital cost to INA-CBGs claim was 67% to 158% for either vaginal or cesarean delivery based on class inpatient room. We found that hospital cost was always higher than claim cost based on INA-CBGs claim. Conclusion: There is a significant discrepancy between hospital cost and INA-CBGs claim (from 67% to 158%) for obstetric services in SoE Rural General Hospital. Keywords: hospital cost, INA-CBGs claim, obstetric.   Abstrak Tujuan: Untuk memberikan gambaran perbedaan dan menganalisis perbedaan antara tarif RS dengan klaim INA-CBGs pada kasus obstetrik di RSUD SoE, Timor Tengah Selatan, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Metode: Studi deskriptif observasional menggunakan dokumen rekam medis dari kasus persalinan pervaginam spontan, persalinan pervaginam dengan alat, dan seksio sesarea dari Oktober hinga Desember 2022. Kami memasukkan seluruh dokumen billing yang lengkap. Dokumen biling yang dibayarkan mandiri dan oleh pemerintah lokal dieskslusi. Analisis data dengan menggunakan IBM SPSS Statistik 23.0. Hasil: Dari 323 persalinan yang terekam di RSUD SoE, hanya 245 kasus diinklusikan. Kebanyakan subjek berusia 30 tahun, dirujuk dari puskesmas, kehamilan cukup bulan, dan ruang perawatan kelas 3. Angka median dari lama rawat pervaginam (baik spontan maupun dengan alat) adalah 2 hari dan seksio sesarea 3 hari. Rerata perbedaan tarif RS dengan klaim INA-CBGs ialah 67% hingga 158% baik persalinan pervaginam maupun seksio sesarea berdasarkan ruang kelas perawatan. Kami menemukan angka tarif RS selalu lebih tinggi cukup jauh dari klaim INA-CBGs. Kesimpulan: Terdapat perbedaan antara tarif RS dan klaim INA-CBGs (antara 67 hingga 158%) untuk prosedur obstetrik di RSUD SoE. Kata kunci: tarif RS, klaim INA-CBGs, obstetrik.
东努沙登加拉省 Soe 农村综合医院产科手术的医院成本与 INA-CBGs 索赔对比
目的:描述并分析东努沙登加拉省东帝汶摄政王中南部 SoE 农村综合医院产科病例中医院费用与 INA-CBGs 索赔之间的差异。 方法:这是一项观察性描述研究,使用的是 2022 年 10 月至 12 月期间自然阴道分娩、辅助阴道分娩和剖腹产病例的医疗记录文件。我们纳入了该期间所有完整的账单文件。由收费服务和地方政府支付费用的病例除外。数据分析采用 IBM SPSS Statistic 23.0 进行:在苏州市乡镇综合医院记录的 323 个分娩病例中,只有 245 个病例被包括在内。大部分受试者年龄在 30 岁左右,由区内基层医疗机构转诊,为足月妊娠,住在三等病房。阴道分娩(自然分娩和助产)和剖宫产的住院时间中位数分别为 2 天和 3 天。根据住院病房等级,阴道分娩或剖宫产的住院费用与 INA-CBGs 索赔的平均差异为 67% 至 158%。我们发现,住院费用总是高于根据 INA-CBGs 索赔的费用。 结论:SoE 农村综合医院产科服务的住院费用与 INA-CBGs 索赔费用之间存在明显差异(从 67% 到 158%)。 关键词:医院成本、INA-CBGs 索赔、产科。 摘要 目的描述并分析东努沙登加拉省东帝汶中南部SoE乡村综合医院产科病例的住院费用与INA-CBGs索赔之间的差异。 研究方法利用 2022 年 10 月至 12 月期间自然阴道分娩、使用器械的阴道分娩和剖腹产病例的医疗记录文件进行描述性观察研究。我们纳入了所有完整的账单文件。不包括自费和地方政府的账单记录。数据使用 IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 进行分析。 结果在 SoE 综合医院记录的 323 例分娩中,只有 245 例被纳入。阴道分娩(自然分娩和使用器械分娩)的住院时间中位数为 2 天,剖腹产的住院时间中位数为 3 天。各病房阴道分娩和剖宫产的住院率与 INA-CBGs 索赔的平均差异为 67% 至 158%。我们发现,住院率总是明显高于 INA-CBGs 的报销率。 结论:RSUD SoE产科手术的医院收费与INA-CBGs报销之间存在差异(67%至158%)。 关键词:医院收费、INA-CBGs报销、产科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信