Media Dualism in Indonesia's Coverage of the Sexual Violence Bill

Nanang Krisdinanto, Merlina Maria Barbara Apul, Theresia Intan Putri Hartiana
{"title":"Media Dualism in Indonesia's Coverage of the Sexual Violence Bill","authors":"Nanang Krisdinanto, Merlina Maria Barbara Apul, Theresia Intan Putri Hartiana","doi":"10.20885/komunikasi.vol18.iss1.art3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is motivated by two primary factors. First, the emergence of alternative news media can be considered as a counterbalance to the professional news media with their various biases. The second pertains to the protracted legislative process of the Sexual Violence Bill (RUU TPKS) before its eventual enactment. The objective of this study is to see examine these two media categories frame the protracted struggle in the legislative process of the TPKS Bill, given that framing reflects the media's perspective, which subsequently influence the audience's understanding of the issue. The subjects of this research are news related to the TPKS Bill as presented by both professional and alternative media in Indonesia. This research employs a qualitative approach in conjunction with the framing method developed by Robert Entman. This study’s findings reveal diametrical contrast in the frames adopted by professional and alternative media in reporting the TPKS Bill. Professional media constructs a frame that characterizes the protracted discussion of the TPKS Bill in the DPR as a technical-procedural problem. In contrast, alternative media framed it as a result of the DPR’s failure or lack of commitment to protect victims of sexual violence.","PeriodicalId":34799,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Komunikasi","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol18.iss1.art3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is motivated by two primary factors. First, the emergence of alternative news media can be considered as a counterbalance to the professional news media with their various biases. The second pertains to the protracted legislative process of the Sexual Violence Bill (RUU TPKS) before its eventual enactment. The objective of this study is to see examine these two media categories frame the protracted struggle in the legislative process of the TPKS Bill, given that framing reflects the media's perspective, which subsequently influence the audience's understanding of the issue. The subjects of this research are news related to the TPKS Bill as presented by both professional and alternative media in Indonesia. This research employs a qualitative approach in conjunction with the framing method developed by Robert Entman. This study’s findings reveal diametrical contrast in the frames adopted by professional and alternative media in reporting the TPKS Bill. Professional media constructs a frame that characterizes the protracted discussion of the TPKS Bill in the DPR as a technical-procedural problem. In contrast, alternative media framed it as a result of the DPR’s failure or lack of commitment to protect victims of sexual violence.
印度尼西亚媒体对性暴力法案报道的双重性
这项研究的动机主要有两个。首先,另类新闻媒体的出现可以说是对带有各种偏见的专业新闻媒体的一种制衡。第二,《性暴力法案》(RUU TPKS)在最终颁布之前的立法过程旷日持久。本研究的目的是研究这两类媒体对《性暴力行为法案》立法过程中旷日持久的斗争所进行的取景,因为取景反映了媒体的视角,而媒体的视角又会影响受众对问题的理解。本研究的对象是印尼专业媒体和另类媒体所报道的有关《大屿山保护制度法案》的新闻。本研究采用了定性方法和罗伯特-恩特曼(Robert Entman)提出的框架法。研究结果表明,专业媒体和另类媒体在报道《大埔卡萨法案》时所采用的框架截然不同。专业媒体构建了一个框架,将大马士革人民议会对《大马士革议会法案》旷日持久的讨论描述为一个技术-程序问题。与此相反,另类媒体则将其归咎于人民代表院未能或缺乏保护性暴力受害者的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信