Comparison of the Karney Polygon Method and the Shoelace Method for Calculating Area

Vikky Aprelia Windarni, Adi Setiawan, Atina Rahmatalia
{"title":"Comparison of the Karney Polygon Method and the Shoelace Method for Calculating Area","authors":"Vikky Aprelia Windarni, Adi Setiawan, Atina Rahmatalia","doi":"10.30812/matrik.v23i1.2929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In calculating the area of an area, latitude and longitude coordinates are based on data from Global Administrative Region Database and Google Earth can be used. The aim of this research is to calculate the area. This research uses the Karney and Shoelace method to determine its accuracy based on Median Absolute Percentage Error in calculating the area of an area. Median Absolute Percentage Error results use data based on Global Administration The Regional Database by applying the polygon method proposed by Karney is 18.73%, and the percentage is 18.19% by applying the Shoelace method. Based on Google Earth data, implementation the method proposed by Karney obtained a percentage of 19.14%, and the application of shoelaces method obtained a percentage of 19.72%. In this case, Karney polygons and the Shoelace method has good accuracy because the value is below 20%. The proposed Shoelace method is easier to perform understand compared to the Karney method for calculating land area because it uses the Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system, which projects points on the Earth's surface onto a flat plane.","PeriodicalId":364657,"journal":{"name":"MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v23i1.2929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In calculating the area of an area, latitude and longitude coordinates are based on data from Global Administrative Region Database and Google Earth can be used. The aim of this research is to calculate the area. This research uses the Karney and Shoelace method to determine its accuracy based on Median Absolute Percentage Error in calculating the area of an area. Median Absolute Percentage Error results use data based on Global Administration The Regional Database by applying the polygon method proposed by Karney is 18.73%, and the percentage is 18.19% by applying the Shoelace method. Based on Google Earth data, implementation the method proposed by Karney obtained a percentage of 19.14%, and the application of shoelaces method obtained a percentage of 19.72%. In this case, Karney polygons and the Shoelace method has good accuracy because the value is below 20%. The proposed Shoelace method is easier to perform understand compared to the Karney method for calculating land area because it uses the Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system, which projects points on the Earth's surface onto a flat plane.
卡尼多边形法与鞋带法计算面积的比较
在计算一个地区的面积时,经纬度坐标以全球行政区域数据库的数据为基础,并可使用谷歌地球。本研究的目的是计算面积。本研究使用 Karney 和 Shoelace 方法,根据绝对百分比误差中位数确定其计算面积的准确性。中位绝对百分比误差结果使用了基于全球行政区域数据库的数据,应用 Karney 提出的多边形方法计算的中位绝对百分比误差为 18.73%,应用 Shoelace 方法计算的中位绝对百分比误差为 18.19%。根据谷歌地球数据,采用卡尼提出的方法得出的百分比为 19.14%,采用鞋带法得出的百分比为 19.72%。在这种情况下,Karney 多边形和鞋带法具有良好的准确性,因为其值低于 20%。与计算土地面积的 Karney 方法相比,拟议的鞋带法更容易理解,因为它使用的是通用横墨卡托坐标系,该坐标系将地球表面的点投影到一个平面上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信