Comparison Of Sewage And Solid Waste Disposal Methods Among Households In Urban And Rural Local Government Areas Of Anambra State

Princewill Chigoziri Chikwe, Obiageli Fidelia Emelumadu, Christian C  Ibeh, Nkiru Nwamaka Ezeama, Grace Nandi Kuyahar
{"title":"Comparison Of Sewage And Solid Waste Disposal Methods Among Households In Urban And Rural Local Government Areas Of Anambra State","authors":"Princewill Chigoziri Chikwe, Obiageli Fidelia Emelumadu, Christian C  Ibeh, Nkiru Nwamaka Ezeama, Grace Nandi Kuyahar","doi":"10.4314/gjpas.v29i2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improper sewage and solid waste disposal lead to environmental pollution and increased risk of communicable diseases. This study compared the sanitation and solid waste disposal facilities utilized in selected rural and urban local government areas of Anambra State, Nigeria. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 1310 households and data was collected from household heads or a designated adult representative using of quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative (KII) data collection methods. The independent variables in this study are the sociodemographic variables and the geographical location of the respondents while the dependent variables are the toilet facilities and solid waste disposal methods. Data from the questionnaire was analyzed using the SPSS version 23 and the hypotheses were tested with the inferential statistics of Chi square at 0.05 level of significance. Most respondents lie between the age group of 31-50 years. Most of the respondents in both the urban (84.4%) and rural(65.0%) areas had secondary education and above but a higher proportion in the urban compared to rural have tertiary education(41.9% versus 22.1%). The difference in educational status was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). There were more business men (46.6%) and civil servants (38.8%) in the urban area than the rural area. Most rural respondents were farmers(41.5%). Many urban household use toilet with sewer connection 152(11.7%) while pit latrine with slab is the most commonly used toilet facility 242 (18.6%). Burning was more commonly used by the rural households (n = 266, 20.5%). Open dumping of refuse and disposal into gullies and water ways were commonly done by the urban households. The gaps that exist between rural and urban areas of Anambra state may present serious health risk and environmental degradation .This issues can be addressed through health education, building more sanitary infrastructure to include the rural areas and enforcing sanitation laws.","PeriodicalId":12516,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v29i2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improper sewage and solid waste disposal lead to environmental pollution and increased risk of communicable diseases. This study compared the sanitation and solid waste disposal facilities utilized in selected rural and urban local government areas of Anambra State, Nigeria. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 1310 households and data was collected from household heads or a designated adult representative using of quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative (KII) data collection methods. The independent variables in this study are the sociodemographic variables and the geographical location of the respondents while the dependent variables are the toilet facilities and solid waste disposal methods. Data from the questionnaire was analyzed using the SPSS version 23 and the hypotheses were tested with the inferential statistics of Chi square at 0.05 level of significance. Most respondents lie between the age group of 31-50 years. Most of the respondents in both the urban (84.4%) and rural(65.0%) areas had secondary education and above but a higher proportion in the urban compared to rural have tertiary education(41.9% versus 22.1%). The difference in educational status was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). There were more business men (46.6%) and civil servants (38.8%) in the urban area than the rural area. Most rural respondents were farmers(41.5%). Many urban household use toilet with sewer connection 152(11.7%) while pit latrine with slab is the most commonly used toilet facility 242 (18.6%). Burning was more commonly used by the rural households (n = 266, 20.5%). Open dumping of refuse and disposal into gullies and water ways were commonly done by the urban households. The gaps that exist between rural and urban areas of Anambra state may present serious health risk and environmental degradation .This issues can be addressed through health education, building more sanitary infrastructure to include the rural areas and enforcing sanitation laws.
阿南布拉州城乡地方政府地区家庭污水和固体废物处理方法的比较
污水和固体废物处理不当会导致环境污染和传染病风险增加。本研究比较了尼日利亚阿南布拉州部分农村和城市地方政府地区的卫生设施和固体废物处理设施的使用情况。这项横断面研究在 1310 个家庭中进行,采用定量(问卷调查)和定性(KII)数据收集方法从户主或指定的成人代表处收集数据。本研究的自变量是受访者的社会人口变量和地理位置,因变量是厕所设施和固体废物处理方法。调查问卷中的数据使用 SPSS 23 版进行分析,并在 0.05 的显著性水平上使用 Chi Square 的推断统计进行假设检验。大多数受访者的年龄介于 31-50 岁之间。城市(84.4%)和农村(65.0%)地区的大多数受访者都受过中等及以上教育,但城市受访者中受过高等教育的比例高于农村(41.9% 对 22.1%)。教育程度的差异在统计学上有显著意义(P = 0.0001)。城市地区的商人(46.6%)和公务员(38.8%)多于农村地区。大多数农村受访者是农民(41.5%)。许多城市家庭使用有下水道连接的厕所 152(11.7%),而最常用的厕所设施是有石板的坑厕 242(18.6%)。农村家庭更常用焚烧法(n = 266,20.5%)。城市家庭通常露天倾倒垃圾,并将垃圾倒入沟渠和水道。阿南布拉州城乡之间存在的差距可能会带来严重的健康风险和环境退化问题,可通过健康教育、建设更多卫生基础设施以覆盖农村地区和执行卫生法来解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信