ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR STUDYING THE TOURIST ATTRACTIVENESS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM CITIES (CASE STUDY OF THE PERM REGION)

S.E. Myshliavtseva, S.A. Merkushev, V.V. Lanin
{"title":"ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR STUDYING THE TOURIST ATTRACTIVENESS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM CITIES (CASE STUDY OF THE PERM REGION)","authors":"S.E. Myshliavtseva, S.A. Merkushev, V.V. Lanin","doi":"10.55959/msu0579-9414.5.78.5.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of the study is to elaborate the assessment methodology for studying the tourist attractiveness of cities. The assessment procedures were tested for small and medium cities of the Perm region. The cities were assessed according to 8 criteria and 30 indicators. According to the results of calculations, four groups of cities with different indices of tourist attractiveness were identified. The group of the highest tourism attractiveness included the cities of Kungur, Solikamsk, Tchaikovsky and Osa. These are mainly cities that have preserved a rich cultural and natural heritage; over the past two decades there is a systematic approach in making managerial decisions to create a friendly environment. The second group includes the cities of Kudymkar, Nytva, Lysva, Ocher, Cherdyn, Dobryanka and Krasnokamsk. The cities have less attractors of tourist flows. The exception is Cherdyn, which has a high density of cultural heritage, but lags behind in the formation of a service environment. The cities of the group have a high potential, but the increase in tourist attractiveness will depend on the diversification and intensification of the industrial and non-industrial spheres. The third group includes the cities of Gubakha, Chusovoy, Chernushka, Usolye, Krasnovishersk and Vereshchagino. Most of the cities are well-recognizable, due to their location near significant tourist landmarks. To increase the attractiveness of the city centers it is necessary to ensure their closer connection with the surrounding dominants in order to achieve a synergy effect. The fourth group included the cities of Chermoz, Okhansk, Kizel, Aleksandrovsk, Gornozavodsk and Gremyachinsk. The group brings together the cities with the highest share of the lowest performance scores. Their further development requires the formation of a touristfrien","PeriodicalId":158808,"journal":{"name":"Lomonosov Geography Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lomonosov Geography Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55959/msu0579-9414.5.78.5.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of the study is to elaborate the assessment methodology for studying the tourist attractiveness of cities. The assessment procedures were tested for small and medium cities of the Perm region. The cities were assessed according to 8 criteria and 30 indicators. According to the results of calculations, four groups of cities with different indices of tourist attractiveness were identified. The group of the highest tourism attractiveness included the cities of Kungur, Solikamsk, Tchaikovsky and Osa. These are mainly cities that have preserved a rich cultural and natural heritage; over the past two decades there is a systematic approach in making managerial decisions to create a friendly environment. The second group includes the cities of Kudymkar, Nytva, Lysva, Ocher, Cherdyn, Dobryanka and Krasnokamsk. The cities have less attractors of tourist flows. The exception is Cherdyn, which has a high density of cultural heritage, but lags behind in the formation of a service environment. The cities of the group have a high potential, but the increase in tourist attractiveness will depend on the diversification and intensification of the industrial and non-industrial spheres. The third group includes the cities of Gubakha, Chusovoy, Chernushka, Usolye, Krasnovishersk and Vereshchagino. Most of the cities are well-recognizable, due to their location near significant tourist landmarks. To increase the attractiveness of the city centers it is necessary to ensure their closer connection with the surrounding dominants in order to achieve a synergy effect. The fourth group included the cities of Chermoz, Okhansk, Kizel, Aleksandrovsk, Gornozavodsk and Gremyachinsk. The group brings together the cities with the highest share of the lowest performance scores. Their further development requires the formation of a touristfrien
研究中小城市旅游吸引力的评估程序(烫发地区案例研究)
该研究的主要目的是详细阐述研究城市旅游吸引力的评估方法。对彼尔姆地区中小城市的评估程序进行了测试。根据 8 项标准和 30 个指标对城市进行了评估。根据计算结果,确定了旅游吸引力指数不同的四组城市。旅游吸引力最高的城市组包括昆古尔市、索利卡姆斯克市、柴可夫斯基市和奥萨市。这些城市主要保存了丰富的文化和自然遗产;在过去的二十年里,这些城市在管理决策方面采用了系统的方法,以创造友好的环境。第二类城市包括库季姆卡尔、涅特瓦、利斯瓦、奥切尔、切尔丁、多布里扬卡和克拉斯诺卡姆斯克。这些城市吸引的游客较少。切尔丁是个例外,它的文化遗产密度很高,但在服务环境的形成方面却比较落后。该组城市的潜力很大,但旅游吸引力的提高将取决于工业和非工业领域的多样化和集约化。第三组城市包括古巴哈、丘索沃伊、切尔努什卡、乌索利耶、克拉斯诺维谢尔斯克和韦列什恰基诺。由于这些城市毗邻重要的旅游地标,它们中的大多数城市都具有很高的知名度。为了提高城市中心的吸引力,有必要确保其与周边主要城市的紧密联系,以实现协同效应。第四组城市包括切尔莫兹、奥汉斯克、基泽尔、亚历山大罗夫斯克、戈尔诺扎沃茨克和格列米亚琴斯克。该组汇集了绩效得分最低但所占比例最高的城市。要进一步发展这些城市,就必须成立一个旅游友好城市联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信