Pengujian Eksperimental Model Sambungan Balok-Kolom Beton Pracetak

Kharisma Nur Cahyani
{"title":"Pengujian Eksperimental Model Sambungan Balok-Kolom Beton Pracetak","authors":"Kharisma Nur Cahyani","doi":"10.32672/jse.v8i4.6721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main issue in the implementation of precast concrete systems lies in the connections. The connections in precast systems must possess the strength to withstand the occurring loads. One of the methods used for connecting precast concrete is the dry connection method. To test the connections of precast beam-columns, a quasi-cyclic loading test is utilized, which generates data on the relationship between load (P) and displacement (∆). The test results indicate that test specimens using 4 anchors have a higher maximum capacity compared to those using 2 anchors. Additionally, the cycles that occur in the test specimen with 2 anchors are longer than those in the specimens with 4 anchors and monolithic specimens. The peak load is achieved by the test specimen with 4 anchors, reaching 1488 kg at a displacement of 18 mm, specifically at a 2% drift. Both the monolithic and 4-anchor test specimens have the same drift, reaching 2%. However, the longest cycles occur in the test specimens with 2 anchors, reaching a 4% drift. Consequently, it can be concluded that the test specimens with 4 anchors have a greater capacity and shorter cycles compared to those using 2 anchors and the monolithic specimens.","PeriodicalId":17758,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Serambi Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Serambi Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v8i4.6721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main issue in the implementation of precast concrete systems lies in the connections. The connections in precast systems must possess the strength to withstand the occurring loads. One of the methods used for connecting precast concrete is the dry connection method. To test the connections of precast beam-columns, a quasi-cyclic loading test is utilized, which generates data on the relationship between load (P) and displacement (∆). The test results indicate that test specimens using 4 anchors have a higher maximum capacity compared to those using 2 anchors. Additionally, the cycles that occur in the test specimen with 2 anchors are longer than those in the specimens with 4 anchors and monolithic specimens. The peak load is achieved by the test specimen with 4 anchors, reaching 1488 kg at a displacement of 18 mm, specifically at a 2% drift. Both the monolithic and 4-anchor test specimens have the same drift, reaching 2%. However, the longest cycles occur in the test specimens with 2 anchors, reaching a 4% drift. Consequently, it can be concluded that the test specimens with 4 anchors have a greater capacity and shorter cycles compared to those using 2 anchors and the monolithic specimens.
预制混凝土梁柱连接模型的实验测试
预制混凝土系统实施过程中的主要问题在于连接。预制系统中的连接件必须具备承受所发生荷载的强度。用于连接预制混凝土的方法之一是干式连接法。为了测试预制梁柱的连接,采用了准周期加载试验,该试验可生成荷载(P)和位移(§†)之间关系的数据。试验结果表明,与使用 2 个锚固件的试样相比,使用 4 个锚固件的试样具有更高的最大承载能力。此外,使用 2 个锚固件的试样比使用 4 个锚固件和整体试样的周期更长。使用 4 个锚固件的试样在位移 18 毫米时达到了 1488 千克的峰值荷载,特别是在漂移 2% 的情况下。整体试样和 4 锚栓试样的漂移量相同,都达到了 2%。然而,使用 2 个锚的试样的循环周期最长,漂移达到 4%。因此,可以得出结论,与使用 2 个锚的试样和整体试样相比,使用 4 个锚的试样具有更大的承载能力和更短的周期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信