Lithuanian Feminine Surname Debates from a Central European Perspective

IF 0.8 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES
Genealogy Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.3390/genealogy7040088
Justyna B. Walkowiak
{"title":"Lithuanian Feminine Surname Debates from a Central European Perspective","authors":"Justyna B. Walkowiak","doi":"10.3390/genealogy7040088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary Lithuania remains the only European country in which official feminine surnames indicate their bearers’ marital status, and this has been the object of fierce public debates over the past decade. Czechia and Slovakia grapple with surprisingly similar issues, even though Czech and Slovak feminine surnames do not reveal marital status. Similar debates in Poland took place a century earlier, a fact which may indicate the possible direction of the changes in the three countries studied. The aim of this article is to present debates concerning feminine surnames in Lithuania from a wider perspective, regarding contemporary Czechia and Slovakia, as well as Poland in the interwar period, and to show from a wider Central and Eastern European perspective that, despite the obvious differences in naming patterns, Lithuanian discussions are not exceptional, and they are part of a larger tendency towards more freedom in the choice of official surname forms for women. It is evident that, although female surnames are inexorably embedded in the language systems of the countries in which they function, their future largely depends on extralinguistic factors such as societal attitudes. While feminine surnames in European states generally seem to be on the decline, the most controversial remain those types that reveal marital status or imply male possession of women, though pragmatic factors might play some role as well, particularly in the case of minorities.","PeriodicalId":73139,"journal":{"name":"Genealogy","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genealogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy7040088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary Lithuania remains the only European country in which official feminine surnames indicate their bearers’ marital status, and this has been the object of fierce public debates over the past decade. Czechia and Slovakia grapple with surprisingly similar issues, even though Czech and Slovak feminine surnames do not reveal marital status. Similar debates in Poland took place a century earlier, a fact which may indicate the possible direction of the changes in the three countries studied. The aim of this article is to present debates concerning feminine surnames in Lithuania from a wider perspective, regarding contemporary Czechia and Slovakia, as well as Poland in the interwar period, and to show from a wider Central and Eastern European perspective that, despite the obvious differences in naming patterns, Lithuanian discussions are not exceptional, and they are part of a larger tendency towards more freedom in the choice of official surname forms for women. It is evident that, although female surnames are inexorably embedded in the language systems of the countries in which they function, their future largely depends on extralinguistic factors such as societal attitudes. While feminine surnames in European states generally seem to be on the decline, the most controversial remain those types that reveal marital status or imply male possession of women, though pragmatic factors might play some role as well, particularly in the case of minorities.
从中欧视角看立陶宛女性姓氏辩论
当代立陶宛仍然是唯一一个官方女性姓氏显示其婚姻状况的欧洲国家,在过去十年中,这一直是公众激烈争论的对象。尽管捷克和斯洛伐克的女性姓氏不显示婚姻状况,但这两个国家仍在努力解决惊人相似的问题。波兰在一个世纪前也发生过类似的争论,这一事实可能表明了所研究的这三个国家的变化方向。本文旨在从更广阔的视角介绍立陶宛有关女性姓氏的辩论,包括当代的捷克和斯洛伐克,以及战时的波兰,并从更广阔的中欧和东欧视角说明,尽管在命名模式上存在明显差异,但立陶宛的讨论并非特例,它们是女性更自由地选择正式姓氏形式这一更大趋势的一部分。显而易见,尽管女性姓氏不可避免地融入了所在国家的语言系统,但其未来在很大程度上取决于社会态度等语言之外的因素。虽然欧洲各国的女性姓氏似乎在普遍减少,但最有争议的仍然是那些显示婚姻状况或暗示男性占有女性的姓氏,尽管实用因素也可能起一定作用,特别是在少数民族的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信