On the methodological framework of composite index under complex surveys and its application in development of food consumption index for India

Deepak Singh, Pradip Basak, Raju Kumar, Tauqueer Ahmad
{"title":"On the methodological framework of composite index under complex surveys and its application in development of food consumption index for India","authors":"Deepak Singh, Pradip Basak, Raju Kumar, Tauqueer Ahmad","doi":"10.3389/fams.2023.1274530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indices are created by consolidating multidimensional data into a single representative measure known as an index, using a fundamental mathematical model. Most present indices are essentially the averages or weighted averages of the variables under study, ignoring multicollinearity among the variables, with the exception of the existing Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimator based OLS-PCA index methodology. Many existing surveys adopt survey designs that incorporate survey weights, aiming to obtain a representative sample of the population while minimizing costs. Survey weights play a crucial role in addressing the unequal probabilities of selection inherent in complex survey designs, ensuring accurate and representative estimates of population parameters. However, the existing OLS-PCA based index methodology is designed for simple random sampling and is incapable of incorporating survey weights, leading to biased estimates and erroneous rankings that can result in flawed inferences and conclusions for survey data. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Survey Weighted PCA (SW-PCA) based Index methodology, tailored for survey-weighted data. SW-PCA incorporates survey weights, facilitating the development of unbiased and efficient composite indices, improving the quality and validity of survey-based research. Simulation studies demonstrate that the SW-PCA based index outperforms the OLS-PCA based index that neglects survey weights, indicating its higher efficiency. To validate the methodology, we applied it to a Household Consumer Expenditure Survey (HCES), NSS 68th Round survey data to construct a Food Consumption Index for different states of India. The result was significant improvements in state rankings when survey weights were considered. In conclusion, this study highlights the crucial importance of incorporating survey weights in index construction from complex survey data. The SW-PCA based Index provides a valuable solution, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of survey-based research, ultimately contributing to more informed decision-making.","PeriodicalId":507585,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2023.1274530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indices are created by consolidating multidimensional data into a single representative measure known as an index, using a fundamental mathematical model. Most present indices are essentially the averages or weighted averages of the variables under study, ignoring multicollinearity among the variables, with the exception of the existing Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimator based OLS-PCA index methodology. Many existing surveys adopt survey designs that incorporate survey weights, aiming to obtain a representative sample of the population while minimizing costs. Survey weights play a crucial role in addressing the unequal probabilities of selection inherent in complex survey designs, ensuring accurate and representative estimates of population parameters. However, the existing OLS-PCA based index methodology is designed for simple random sampling and is incapable of incorporating survey weights, leading to biased estimates and erroneous rankings that can result in flawed inferences and conclusions for survey data. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Survey Weighted PCA (SW-PCA) based Index methodology, tailored for survey-weighted data. SW-PCA incorporates survey weights, facilitating the development of unbiased and efficient composite indices, improving the quality and validity of survey-based research. Simulation studies demonstrate that the SW-PCA based index outperforms the OLS-PCA based index that neglects survey weights, indicating its higher efficiency. To validate the methodology, we applied it to a Household Consumer Expenditure Survey (HCES), NSS 68th Round survey data to construct a Food Consumption Index for different states of India. The result was significant improvements in state rankings when survey weights were considered. In conclusion, this study highlights the crucial importance of incorporating survey weights in index construction from complex survey data. The SW-PCA based Index provides a valuable solution, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of survey-based research, ultimately contributing to more informed decision-making.
论复杂调查下的综合指数方法框架及其在编制印度食品消费指数中的应用
指数是通过使用基本数学模型,将多维数据合并成一个具有代表性的衡量指标,即指数。目前大多数指数基本上是所研究变量的平均值或加权平均值,忽略了变量之间的多重共线性,但现有的基于普通最小二乘法(OLS)估计的 OLS-PCA 指数方法除外。现有的许多调查都采用了包含调查权重的调查设计,旨在获得具有代表性的人口样本,同时最大限度地降低成本。调查权重在解决复杂调查设计中固有的不平等选择概率方面发挥着至关重要的作用,可确保对人口参数进行准确且具有代表性的估计。然而,现有的基于 OLS-PCA 的指数方法是为简单随机抽样而设计的,无法纳入调查权重,从而导致估计值有偏差,排序错误,从而使调查数据的推论和结论存在缺陷。为解决这一局限性,我们提出了一种基于调查加权 PCA(SW-PCA)的新指数方法,专为调查加权数据定制。SW-PCA 融合了调查加权,有助于开发无偏且高效的综合指数,从而提高基于调查的研究的质量和有效性。模拟研究表明,基于 SW-PCA 的指数优于忽略调查权重的基于 OLS-PCA 的指数,表明其效率更高。为了验证该方法的有效性,我们将其应用于家庭消费支出调查(HCES)、国家统计系统第 68 轮调查数据,以构建印度不同邦的食品消费指数。结果显示,在考虑调查权重的情况下,各邦的排名有了明显改善。总之,本研究强调了在利用复杂的调查数据构建指数时纳入调查权重的重要性。基于 SW-PCA 的指数提供了一个有价值的解决方案,提高了基于调查研究的准确性和可靠性,最终有助于做出更明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信