The political identity for Megalia, Womand and Webtoon to counter Confucianism culture in South Korea

Simulacra Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.21107/sml.v6i2.22294
Sabda Ningsih
{"title":"The political identity for Megalia, Womand and Webtoon to counter Confucianism culture in South Korea","authors":"Sabda Ningsih","doi":"10.21107/sml.v6i2.22294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Referring to the wave of digital feminism in the modern era, this paper formulates the problem of South Korea's digital feminism strategy in reconstructing Confucianism culture with respect to morality. The study aims to analyze the development of digital feminist activist morality in South Korea against the background of a Confucian society and rapid economic growth. Of the numerous online feminist activist groups, Megalia and Womand have garnered attention from several feminist scholars. Moreover, later Webtoon comic artists incorporated feminist ideologies into their comic narratives. Based on Andrew Heywood's cultural conflict and identity politics perspective, as well as political morality in realism, the author has identified two crucial findings. First, the three of them operate from a realistic perspective that excludes Confucian morality as a factor in their decision making. Second, Megalia and Womand tend to exhibit radical behavior due to their exclusive focus on identity politics. This contrasts with Webtoon, which creates comics driven by economic interests, resulting in more moderate behavior and a preference for cultural distribution.","PeriodicalId":33192,"journal":{"name":"Simulacra","volume":"120 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulacra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v6i2.22294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Referring to the wave of digital feminism in the modern era, this paper formulates the problem of South Korea's digital feminism strategy in reconstructing Confucianism culture with respect to morality. The study aims to analyze the development of digital feminist activist morality in South Korea against the background of a Confucian society and rapid economic growth. Of the numerous online feminist activist groups, Megalia and Womand have garnered attention from several feminist scholars. Moreover, later Webtoon comic artists incorporated feminist ideologies into their comic narratives. Based on Andrew Heywood's cultural conflict and identity politics perspective, as well as political morality in realism, the author has identified two crucial findings. First, the three of them operate from a realistic perspective that excludes Confucian morality as a factor in their decision making. Second, Megalia and Womand tend to exhibit radical behavior due to their exclusive focus on identity politics. This contrasts with Webtoon, which creates comics driven by economic interests, resulting in more moderate behavior and a preference for cultural distribution.
韩国反儒家文化的《Megalia》、《Womand》和《Webtoon》的政治特性
本文以现代数字女性主义浪潮为背景,提出了韩国数字女性主义在道德方面重构儒家文化的策略问题。本研究旨在分析在儒家社会和经济快速增长的背景下,韩国数字女权运动的道德发展情况。在众多网络女权运动团体中,Megalia 和 Womand 引起了一些女权学者的关注。此外,后来的 Webtoon 漫画家也将女权主义意识形态融入了他们的漫画叙事中。基于安德鲁-海伍德(Andrew Heywood)的文化冲突和身份政治视角,以及现实主义中的政治道德观,作者得出了两个重要发现。首先,他们三人都从现实主义的角度出发,将儒家道德排除在决策因素之外。其次,Megalia 和 Womand 倾向于表现出激进的行为,因为他们只关注身份政治。这与 Webtoon 形成了鲜明对比,Webtoon 以经济利益为驱动力创作漫画,因此其行为更为温和,更倾向于文化传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信