Analytical hierarchy process for ranking green neighbourhood efforts in the Middle East and North Africa region

Moureen Asaad, Ghada Farouk Hassan, A. Elshater, Samy Afifi
{"title":"Analytical hierarchy process for ranking green neighbourhood efforts in the Middle East and North Africa region","authors":"Moureen Asaad, Ghada Farouk Hassan, A. Elshater, Samy Afifi","doi":"10.1108/arch-08-2023-0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeResearch on green certificate rankings in the MENA region primarily focuses on building scale, relying on the certified project count. This assessment approach overlooks the spatial factor, failing to capture their influence on the urban built environment, thus potentially undermining other efforts not reflected by the project count. This research aims to rank countries in the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) region based on their ongoing efforts regarding green neighbourhood certification.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs a three-phase methodology to rank MENA countries' adoption of green neighbourhood certification systems: content analysis, multicriteria analysis (MCA) using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and spatial analysis.FindingsBased on the content analysis, four major performance indicators were identified and the conventional ranking using projects count was presented. Using AHP, the MCA could rank the countries in the region according to their unique performance indicators score, clarifying the differences between conventional and AHP-based rankings. Finally, the spatial analysis phase uncovers shortcomings in the traditional ranking method, revealing inaccuracies and misrepresentations for several countries.Originality/valueThe study presents an innovative ranking methodology to monitor the green neighbourhood actions of countries in future development and establish a pioneering framework to evaluate the impact of green certifications within the region.","PeriodicalId":503590,"journal":{"name":"Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-08-2023-0205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeResearch on green certificate rankings in the MENA region primarily focuses on building scale, relying on the certified project count. This assessment approach overlooks the spatial factor, failing to capture their influence on the urban built environment, thus potentially undermining other efforts not reflected by the project count. This research aims to rank countries in the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) region based on their ongoing efforts regarding green neighbourhood certification.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs a three-phase methodology to rank MENA countries' adoption of green neighbourhood certification systems: content analysis, multicriteria analysis (MCA) using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and spatial analysis.FindingsBased on the content analysis, four major performance indicators were identified and the conventional ranking using projects count was presented. Using AHP, the MCA could rank the countries in the region according to their unique performance indicators score, clarifying the differences between conventional and AHP-based rankings. Finally, the spatial analysis phase uncovers shortcomings in the traditional ranking method, revealing inaccuracies and misrepresentations for several countries.Originality/valueThe study presents an innovative ranking methodology to monitor the green neighbourhood actions of countries in future development and establish a pioneering framework to evaluate the impact of green certifications within the region.
中东和北非地区绿色邻里工作排名分析层次法
目的有关中东和北非地区绿色证书排名的研究主要侧重于建筑规模,依赖于认证项目数量。这种评估方法忽略了空间因素,未能体现其对城市建筑环境的影响,因此可能会削弱项目数量未能反映的其他努力。本研究旨在根据中东和北非(MENA)地区国家在绿色街区认证方面的持续努力对其进行排名。本研究采用三阶段方法对中东和北非国家采用绿色街区认证系统的情况进行排名:内容分析、使用分析层次过程(AHP)的多标准分析(MCA)和空间分析。研究结果在内容分析的基础上,确定了四个主要绩效指标,并提出了使用项目计数的传统排名方法。利用层次分析法(AHP),MCA 可以根据各国独特的绩效指标得分对该地区的国家进行排序,从而明确了传统排序与基于层次分析法的排序之间的差异。最后,空间分析阶段揭示了传统排名方法的缺陷,揭示了几个国家的不准确性和失实性。 原创性/价值 该研究提出了一种创新的排名方法,用于监测各国在未来发展中的绿色街区行动,并建立了一个评估绿色认证在该地区影响的开创性框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信