Dissolving dichotomies: Norbert Elias’s legacy for thinking “memory” sociologically

IF 1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY

Journal of Classical Sociology Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1177/1468795x231212418

Veridiana Domingos Cordeiro

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses how Elisian ideas on memory could have changed the history of Memory Studies ideas. The history of the phenomenon of memory inside the sociological field reflects the foundational dichotomies of the discipline: macro × micro dimensions and biological × social realms. Many of the hurdles and discussions of Memory Studies still lie upon these dichotomies. Although Elias has never investigated this topic properly, he has a rich discussion on relationality, interdisciplinarity, and processuality. These three aspects would dissolve many of the actual hurdles faced by Memory Studies.

查看原文本刊更多论文

消解二分法：诺伯特-埃利亚斯从社会学角度思考 "记忆 "的遗产

本文讨论了埃利希安的记忆思想如何改变了记忆研究思想的历史。记忆现象在社会学领域的历史反映了该学科的基本二分法：宏观与微观、生物领域与社会领域。记忆研究的许多障碍和讨论仍然建立在这些二分法之上。虽然埃利亚斯从未好好研究过这个话题，但他对关系性、跨学科性和过程性进行了丰富的讨论。这三个方面将消除记忆研究面临的许多实际障碍。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Classical Sociology SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Classical Sociology publishes cutting-edge articles that will command general respect within the academic community. The aim of the Journal of Classical Sociology is to demonstrate scholarly excellence in the study of the sociological tradition. The journal elucidates the origins of sociology and also demonstrates how the classical tradition renews the sociological imagination in the present day. The journal is a critical but constructive reflection on the roots and formation of sociology from the Enlightenment to the 21st century. Journal of Classical Sociology promotes discussions of early social theory, such as Hobbesian contract theory, through the 19th- and early 20th- century classics associated with the thought of Comte, Marx, Durkheim, Weber, Simmel, Veblen.