Internal Revision with Bleb Needling: An Effective, Safe Option for Failing Blebs

Kirti Singh, Neha Sachdev, Arshi Singh
{"title":"Internal Revision with Bleb Needling: An Effective, Safe Option for Failing Blebs","authors":"Kirti Singh, Neha Sachdev, Arshi Singh","doi":"10.12974/2309-6136.2023.10.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To report the outcomes of internal revision with bleb needling in cases of failing blebs with the internal sclerostomy blocked by iris tissue. Methods: Prospective study of 26 eyes of 26 patients with failing blebs where target IOP was not achieved with 2 anti-glaucoma drugs and sclerostomy was blocked by iris (confirmed on gonioscopy). Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the time from the first surgery- early (<3 months), intermediate (4-12 months) and late (>1 year). Patients underwent internal revision with bleb needling with either 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or Mitomycin C (MMC) Results: 26 eyes of 26 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 51.35±14.5 years. Time from the filtration surgery was early in 3, intermediate in 5 and late in 18 eyes. Mean IOP reduction at 3 months was 32±18% with maximum reduction in early group (40%). Mean IOP decreased from 24.5±3.4 mmHg to 16.2±4.3 mmHg in 5-FU group (12 patients) and 27.4±9 mmHg to 18.2±6.6 mmHg in MMC group (14 patients). Self-limiting complications were hyphema in 2 patients and subconjunctival haemorrhage in 1 patient. Conclusion: Internal revision with bleb needling is a safe and effective procedure for reviving failing blebs.","PeriodicalId":73874,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ocular diseases and therapeutics","volume":" 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ocular diseases and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12974/2309-6136.2023.10.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To report the outcomes of internal revision with bleb needling in cases of failing blebs with the internal sclerostomy blocked by iris tissue. Methods: Prospective study of 26 eyes of 26 patients with failing blebs where target IOP was not achieved with 2 anti-glaucoma drugs and sclerostomy was blocked by iris (confirmed on gonioscopy). Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the time from the first surgery- early (<3 months), intermediate (4-12 months) and late (>1 year). Patients underwent internal revision with bleb needling with either 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or Mitomycin C (MMC) Results: 26 eyes of 26 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 51.35±14.5 years. Time from the filtration surgery was early in 3, intermediate in 5 and late in 18 eyes. Mean IOP reduction at 3 months was 32±18% with maximum reduction in early group (40%). Mean IOP decreased from 24.5±3.4 mmHg to 16.2±4.3 mmHg in 5-FU group (12 patients) and 27.4±9 mmHg to 18.2±6.6 mmHg in MMC group (14 patients). Self-limiting complications were hyphema in 2 patients and subconjunctival haemorrhage in 1 patient. Conclusion: Internal revision with bleb needling is a safe and effective procedure for reviving failing blebs.
出血针内翻术:治疗失败出血的有效、安全方案
目的:报告对虹膜组织阻塞内硬膜造口术失败的出血点病例进行出血点针刺内翻修的结果。 方法:前瞻性研究对使用两种抗青光眼药物仍无法达到目标眼压,且硬化剂被虹膜阻塞(经眼底镜检查确认)的 26 位眼底手术失败患者的 26 只眼睛进行前瞻性研究。根据首次手术的时间,患者被分为 3 组--早期(1 年)。结果:26 名患者的 26 只眼睛被纳入研究。平均年龄为(51.35±14.5)岁。滤过手术时间为早期的有 3 眼,中期的有 5 眼,晚期的有 18 眼。3 个月后的平均眼压降低率为 32±18%,其中早期组的降低率最高(40%)。5-FU 组(12 名患者)的平均眼压从 24.5±3.4 mmHg 降至 16.2±4.3 mmHg,MMC 组(14 名患者)的平均眼压从 27.4±9 mmHg 降至 18.2±6.6 mmHg。自限性并发症为 2 例患者出现红斑,1 例患者出现结膜下出血。 结论:眼泡针刺内翻修术是一种安全有效的修复失败眼泡的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信