Connecting Community-Based Monitoring to environmental governance in the Arctic: A systematic scoping review of the literature

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Nicole J. Wilson, Elizabeth Worden, Grace O’Hanlon
{"title":"Connecting Community-Based Monitoring to environmental governance in the Arctic: A systematic scoping review of the literature","authors":"Nicole J. Wilson, Elizabeth Worden, Grace O’Hanlon","doi":"10.1139/as-2023-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arctic Community-Based Monitoring (CBM) programs occur within complex governance landscapes. Indigenous rightsholders are increasingly significant political actors and where environmental and political injustices related to climate change and resource development motivate monitoring. We draw on a systematic scoping literature review to examine the current state of the literature on Arctic CBM and environmental governance. Relevant articles (n=27) were identified through inclusion/exclusion criteria (i.e., English language, peer reviewed, published between 1991 and 2021, based on primary research) and analyzed using a data extraction questionnaire. We find that there is a growing focus on the relationship between Arctic CBM and governance at a variety of scales and in a range of environmental systems. Importantly, Indigenous peoples play a significant role within this literature in that most included articles discussed Indigenous Knowledge. However, less than half of the articles discussed Indigenous peoples as rightsholders with significant governance roles. Based on our findings we recommend future studies engage critical analysis of the influence of the, often unequal, governance and politics in the Arctic 1) on environmental decision-making, 2) the politics of knowledge, and 3) the use of digital technologies in the collection, storage, and mobilization of CBM data.","PeriodicalId":48575,"journal":{"name":"Arctic Science","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2023-0034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arctic Community-Based Monitoring (CBM) programs occur within complex governance landscapes. Indigenous rightsholders are increasingly significant political actors and where environmental and political injustices related to climate change and resource development motivate monitoring. We draw on a systematic scoping literature review to examine the current state of the literature on Arctic CBM and environmental governance. Relevant articles (n=27) were identified through inclusion/exclusion criteria (i.e., English language, peer reviewed, published between 1991 and 2021, based on primary research) and analyzed using a data extraction questionnaire. We find that there is a growing focus on the relationship between Arctic CBM and governance at a variety of scales and in a range of environmental systems. Importantly, Indigenous peoples play a significant role within this literature in that most included articles discussed Indigenous Knowledge. However, less than half of the articles discussed Indigenous peoples as rightsholders with significant governance roles. Based on our findings we recommend future studies engage critical analysis of the influence of the, often unequal, governance and politics in the Arctic 1) on environmental decision-making, 2) the politics of knowledge, and 3) the use of digital technologies in the collection, storage, and mobilization of CBM data.
将基于社区的监测与北极环境治理联系起来:对文献进行系统的范围界定审查
北极社区监测(CBM)项目发生在复杂的治理环境中。原住民权利拥有者日益成为重要的政治参与者,与气候变化和资源开发相关的环境和政治不公正现象也促使我们进行监测。我们通过系统的范围性文献综述,研究了有关北极 CBM 和环境治理的文献现状。相关文章(n=27)通过纳入/排除标准(即英语、同行评审、1991 年至 2021 年间发表、基于初级研究)进行了识别,并使用数据提取问卷进行了分析。我们发现,在各种规模和各种环境系统中,人们越来越关注北极建立信任措施与治理之间的关系。重要的是,原住民在这些文献中发挥了重要作用,因为大多数收录的文章都讨论了原住民知识。然而,只有不到一半的文章讨论了土著居民作为权利拥有者在治理中的重要作用。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议未来的研究对北极地区的治理和政治(通常是不平等的)的影响进行批判性分析,1)对环境决策的影响,2)知识政治,3)在收集、存储和调动建立信任措施数据时数字技术的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arctic Science
Arctic Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Arctic Science is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed research from all areas of natural science and applied science & engineering related to northern Polar Regions. The focus on basic and applied science includes the traditional knowledge and observations of the indigenous peoples of the region as well as cutting-edge developments in biological, chemical, physical and engineering science in all northern environments. Reports on interdisciplinary research are encouraged. Special issues and sections dealing with important issues in northern polar science are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信