Innovations in Journalism as Complex Interplay: Supportive and Obstructive Factors in International Comparison

IF 2.7 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Klaus Meier, Michael Grassl, J. García-Avilés, Dámaso Mondéjar, A. Kaltenbrunner, Renée Lugschitz, Colin Porlezza, Petra Mazzoni, Vinzenz Wyss, Mirco Saner
{"title":"Innovations in Journalism as Complex Interplay: Supportive and Obstructive Factors in International Comparison","authors":"Klaus Meier, Michael Grassl, J. García-Avilés, Dámaso Mondéjar, A. Kaltenbrunner, Renée Lugschitz, Colin Porlezza, Petra Mazzoni, Vinzenz Wyss, Mirco Saner","doi":"10.17645/mac.7443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Where does innovation in journalism come from, how is it implemented, and what factors drive or hinder its development? Scholars have explored these questions from different perspectives for over two decades. Our research holistically considers the broader factors that influence the development of journalistic innovation at the macro, meso, and micro levels, and whether it is internally or externally driven. In a three-year international research project, we have unpacked innovation with this multidimensional approach, looking at the most important innovations in journalism in Austria, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK. Our study focuses on the mutual interplay between journalists, media organizations, and society. We investigated 100 case studies with 137 guided interviews with senior managers or project leaders. The results show that the focus of supporting and obstructive factors is internal and on the meso level and that many parallels exist between media systems. Internal factors are the intrinsic motivation of individuals, which need the support of open-minded management, allowing a culture of experimentation without economic pressure and assembling interdisciplinary teams. Across countries and independent of the respective media system, three external key drivers of innovation in journalism can be identified: technology, societal change, and change in the digital media universe. The study confirms once again as if through a magnifying glass that journalism is primarily a public service, especially for those innovations that strengthen the role of journalism in a democratic society.","PeriodicalId":18348,"journal":{"name":"Media and Communication","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Where does innovation in journalism come from, how is it implemented, and what factors drive or hinder its development? Scholars have explored these questions from different perspectives for over two decades. Our research holistically considers the broader factors that influence the development of journalistic innovation at the macro, meso, and micro levels, and whether it is internally or externally driven. In a three-year international research project, we have unpacked innovation with this multidimensional approach, looking at the most important innovations in journalism in Austria, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK. Our study focuses on the mutual interplay between journalists, media organizations, and society. We investigated 100 case studies with 137 guided interviews with senior managers or project leaders. The results show that the focus of supporting and obstructive factors is internal and on the meso level and that many parallels exist between media systems. Internal factors are the intrinsic motivation of individuals, which need the support of open-minded management, allowing a culture of experimentation without economic pressure and assembling interdisciplinary teams. Across countries and independent of the respective media system, three external key drivers of innovation in journalism can be identified: technology, societal change, and change in the digital media universe. The study confirms once again as if through a magnifying glass that journalism is primarily a public service, especially for those innovations that strengthen the role of journalism in a democratic society.
新闻业的创新是复杂的相互作用:国际比较中的支持和阻碍因素
新闻业的创新从何而来,如何实施,哪些因素推动或阻碍其发展?二十多年来,学者们从不同角度探讨了这些问题。我们的研究从宏观、中观和微观层面全面考虑了影响新闻创新发展的更广泛因素,以及新闻创新是由内部驱动还是外部驱动。在一个为期三年的国际研究项目中,我们用这种多维方法解读了创新,研究了奥地利、德国、西班牙、瑞士和英国新闻业最重要的创新。我们的研究侧重于记者、媒体组织和社会之间的相互影响。我们对 100 个案例进行了调查,并对高级管理人员或项目负责人进行了 137 次有指导的访谈。研究结果表明,支持和阻碍因素的重点在于内部和中观层面,媒体系统之间存在许多相似之处。内部因素是个人的内在动力,需要思想开放的管理层的支持,允许没有经济压力的实验文化,以及组建跨学科团队。在不同的国家和不同的媒体系统中,可以发现新闻业创新的三个外部关键驱动因素:技术、社会变革和数字媒体领域的变革。这项研究通过放大镜再次证实,新闻业主要是一项公共服务,尤其是那些加强新闻业在民主社会中作用的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media and Communication
Media and Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183-2439) is an international open access journal dedicated to a wide variety of basic and applied research in communication and its related fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信