The EU Accession to the Istanbul Convention: The Argument From the ‘common Accord’ Practice

Karolina Kaja Kubacka
{"title":"The EU Accession to the Istanbul Convention: The Argument From the ‘common Accord’ Practice","authors":"Karolina Kaja Kubacka","doi":"10.2478/wrlae-2022-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The main purpose of this article is to analyse the Council’s practice of ‘common accord’ as the argument behind the tardiness of accession to the Istanbul Convention by the European Union. It presents how political and legal factors condition the accession of the Istanbul Convention by the European Union. In light of the Court of Justice Opinion 1/19, there are no legal obstacles to the accession; therefore, the tardiness of ratification arose from the political context, which consists of the EU’s constitutional crisis, populists in power, and liberal decision-makers succumbing to them. Based on the sociological assumption, the case study confirms the existence of the practice of ‘common accord’ as an effect of the conditions mentioned above. Nevertheless, the social need to access the Istanbul Convention is urgent.","PeriodicalId":508988,"journal":{"name":"Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2022-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The main purpose of this article is to analyse the Council’s practice of ‘common accord’ as the argument behind the tardiness of accession to the Istanbul Convention by the European Union. It presents how political and legal factors condition the accession of the Istanbul Convention by the European Union. In light of the Court of Justice Opinion 1/19, there are no legal obstacles to the accession; therefore, the tardiness of ratification arose from the political context, which consists of the EU’s constitutional crisis, populists in power, and liberal decision-makers succumbing to them. Based on the sociological assumption, the case study confirms the existence of the practice of ‘common accord’ as an effect of the conditions mentioned above. Nevertheless, the social need to access the Istanbul Convention is urgent.
欧盟加入《伊斯坦布尔公约》:来自 "共同协议 "实践的论证
摘 要 本文的主要目的是分析欧盟理事会的 "共同协议 "实践是欧盟迟迟未能加入《伊斯坦布尔公约》的原因。文章介绍了政治和法律因素是如何制约欧洲联盟加入《伊斯坦布尔公约》的。根据法院第 1/19 号意见,加入《伊斯坦布尔公约》不存在任何法律障碍;因此,迟迟未批准《伊斯坦布尔公约》源于政治背景,包括欧盟的宪法危机、民粹主义者掌权以及自由派决策者屈服于民粹主义者。基于社会学假设,案例研究证实了 "共同协议 "做法的存在是上述条件的结果。然而,加入《伊斯坦布尔公约》的社会需求是迫切的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信