The Research Trends of the Korean Society of Medicine & Therapy Science: From 2009 to 2022

Jae-Yeop Chung
{"title":"The Research Trends of the Korean Society of Medicine & Therapy Science: From 2009 to 2022","authors":"Jae-Yeop Chung","doi":"10.31321/kmts.2023.15.2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze research trends in occupational therapy and propose future research directions. Additionally, the study aims to recommend a strategy for establishing foundational data, which can enhance the expertise of occupational therapy professionals and contribute to the formulation of relevant policies.ublished in the Korean Society of Medicine & Therapy Science from 2009 to 2022, an analysis was conducted on the type of research, evidence level, field of research. Method: For the 223 articles pinformation regarding the first author, and the type of study participation. Results: Following the analysis, it was observed that experimental research constituted the highest proportion at 78.3 %, with level 2 evidence being predominant at 32.6 %. Notably, in the last three years, there was an increase in studies classified at levels 3 and 4. In terms of research fields, neurological occupational therapy held the majority at 60.9 %, while the primary position of the first author was occupied by occupational therapists, accounting for 80.4 %. Regarding participant demographics, studies targeting adults comprised the largest share at 81.3 %, and the most frequently studied diagnosis was stroke. Conclusion: The findings presented herein aim to provide readers with insights into the evolving landscape of occupational therapy research, contributing valuable information to enhance understanding and augment the available body of evidence in the field.","PeriodicalId":342499,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Medicine & Therapy Science","volume":"164 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Society of Medicine & Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31321/kmts.2023.15.2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze research trends in occupational therapy and propose future research directions. Additionally, the study aims to recommend a strategy for establishing foundational data, which can enhance the expertise of occupational therapy professionals and contribute to the formulation of relevant policies.ublished in the Korean Society of Medicine & Therapy Science from 2009 to 2022, an analysis was conducted on the type of research, evidence level, field of research. Method: For the 223 articles pinformation regarding the first author, and the type of study participation. Results: Following the analysis, it was observed that experimental research constituted the highest proportion at 78.3 %, with level 2 evidence being predominant at 32.6 %. Notably, in the last three years, there was an increase in studies classified at levels 3 and 4. In terms of research fields, neurological occupational therapy held the majority at 60.9 %, while the primary position of the first author was occupied by occupational therapists, accounting for 80.4 %. Regarding participant demographics, studies targeting adults comprised the largest share at 81.3 %, and the most frequently studied diagnosis was stroke. Conclusion: The findings presented herein aim to provide readers with insights into the evolving landscape of occupational therapy research, contributing valuable information to enhance understanding and augment the available body of evidence in the field.
韩国医学与治疗科学学会的研究趋势:从 2009 年到 2022 年
研究目的本研究旨在分析职业疗法的研究趋势,并提出未来的研究方向。此外,本研究还旨在提出建立基础数据的策略建议,从而提高职业疗法专业人员的专业知识,并为相关政策的制定做出贡献。 方法:对 223 篇文章的第一作者、参与研究的类型等信息进行分析。 结果分析结果显示,实验研究占比最高,达 78.3%,二级证据占比 32.6%。值得注意的是,在过去三年中,被划分为 3 级和 4 级的研究有所增加。就研究领域而言,神经职业疗法占大多数,为 60.9%,而职业治疗师是第一作者,占 80.4%。在参与者人口统计学方面,以成年人为对象的研究最多,占 81.3%,最常研究的诊断是中风。 结论本文介绍的研究结果旨在让读者深入了解职业治疗研究不断发展的现状,提供有价值的信息,以加深对该领域的理解并增加该领域的现有证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信