Selflessness: An International Comparative Analysis of a Much-Needed Public Value

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Christina W. Andrews, Michiel De Vries
{"title":"Selflessness: An International Comparative Analysis of a Much-Needed Public Value","authors":"Christina W. Andrews, Michiel De Vries","doi":"10.17573/cepar.2023.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to investigate how selflessness is to be measured and how it is to be explained. Adopting an innovative approach to measure selflessness, we assess its prevalence in different regions across the world. We also investigate the factors that explain its emergence and how they interact in predicting it. The level of selflessness differs significantly across the world. Considering the factors predicting it, we find that the likelihood of an individual exhibiting selflessness largely depends on the region they live in. Workplace also plays a crucial role – in OECD countries, working in the public sector increases the propensity for selflessness, but it has the opposite effect in Africa.The research design involves a multivariate analysis of data from the World Values Survey using both straight-forward regression analyses and binary logistic regression.The main findings show that the impact of factors traditionally considered important, such as religious affiliation and employment in the public, private, or not-for-profit sectors, varies across regions. These region-specific interaction effects are seen, for instance, in the influence of one’s workplace on their propensity for selflessness. Public sector employees are significantly more likely to be selfless than their private sector counterparts. However, while working in the public sector increases the likelihood of being selfless in OECD countries, this relationship is reversed in Africa.In previous academic studies, little attention was paid to such interaction effects and the impacts of religious affiliation, public sector employment, gender, etc. were assumed to be stable all over the world. This study shows otherwise.As per practical implications, the results of our analyses suggest that research on values needs to be contextualized. This is particularly important when research aims at offering advice to practitioners. Our investigation has shown that the same factors that enhance selflessness in one part of the world may decrease its presence in other regions. A one-size-fits-all approach is therefore not adequate.","PeriodicalId":53802,"journal":{"name":"Central European Public Administration Review","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2023.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate how selflessness is to be measured and how it is to be explained. Adopting an innovative approach to measure selflessness, we assess its prevalence in different regions across the world. We also investigate the factors that explain its emergence and how they interact in predicting it. The level of selflessness differs significantly across the world. Considering the factors predicting it, we find that the likelihood of an individual exhibiting selflessness largely depends on the region they live in. Workplace also plays a crucial role – in OECD countries, working in the public sector increases the propensity for selflessness, but it has the opposite effect in Africa.The research design involves a multivariate analysis of data from the World Values Survey using both straight-forward regression analyses and binary logistic regression.The main findings show that the impact of factors traditionally considered important, such as religious affiliation and employment in the public, private, or not-for-profit sectors, varies across regions. These region-specific interaction effects are seen, for instance, in the influence of one’s workplace on their propensity for selflessness. Public sector employees are significantly more likely to be selfless than their private sector counterparts. However, while working in the public sector increases the likelihood of being selfless in OECD countries, this relationship is reversed in Africa.In previous academic studies, little attention was paid to such interaction effects and the impacts of religious affiliation, public sector employment, gender, etc. were assumed to be stable all over the world. This study shows otherwise.As per practical implications, the results of our analyses suggest that research on values needs to be contextualized. This is particularly important when research aims at offering advice to practitioners. Our investigation has shown that the same factors that enhance selflessness in one part of the world may decrease its presence in other regions. A one-size-fits-all approach is therefore not adequate.
无私:对亟需的公共价值观的国际比较分析
本文旨在探讨如何衡量无私精神以及如何解释无私精神。我们采用一种创新的方法来衡量无私精神,并评估其在全球不同地区的普遍程度。我们还研究了解释无私精神出现的因素,以及这些因素在预测无私精神时如何相互作用。世界各地的无私程度差异很大。考虑到预测无私精神的因素,我们发现个人表现出无私精神的可能性在很大程度上取决于他们所生活的地区。研究设计包括对《世界价值观调查》的数据进行多元分析,采用直接回归分析和二元逻辑回归分析。主要研究结果表明,传统上被认为重要的因素,如宗教信仰和在公共部门、私营部门或非营利部门就业,在不同地区的影响是不同的。例如,工作场所对个人无私倾向的影响就体现了这些地区特定的交互效应。公共部门员工无私倾向明显高于私营部门员工。然而,在经合组织国家,在公共部门工作会增加无私的可能性,而在非洲,这种关系却相反。在以往的学术研究中,很少关注这种互动效应,宗教信仰、公共部门就业、性别等因素的影响被认为在全世界都是稳定的。我们的分析结果表明,有关价值观的研究需要结合实际情况。当研究旨在为实践者提供建议时,这一点尤为重要。我们的调查表明,在世界某个地区增强无私精神的相同因素,在其他地区可能会减少无私精神的存在。因此,"一刀切 "的方法是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信