Evidence-Based Communication to Increase Melanoma Knowledge and Skin Checks

Ariel Nadratowski , Brittany Shoots-Reinhard , Autumn Shafer , Jerusha Detweiler-Bedell , Brian Detweiler-Bedell , Sancy Leachman , Ellen Peters
{"title":"Evidence-Based Communication to Increase Melanoma Knowledge and Skin Checks","authors":"Ariel Nadratowski ,&nbsp;Brittany Shoots-Reinhard ,&nbsp;Autumn Shafer ,&nbsp;Jerusha Detweiler-Bedell ,&nbsp;Brian Detweiler-Bedell ,&nbsp;Sancy Leachman ,&nbsp;Ellen Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2023.100253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rates of melanoma—the deadliest form of skin cancer—have increased. Early detection can save lives, and patients have a critical role to play in checking their skin. We aim to identify health communication messages that best educate the public and increase intentions toward skin checks. After viewing messages intended to increase melanoma knowledge, participants correctly identified a greater proportion (74.6 vs 70.4%) of moles (mean number = 17.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.5–18.3 vs 16.9, 95% CI = 16.6–17.3; <em>P</em> &lt; .001, partial eta-squared = 0.03) and had knowledge of more melanoma warning signs (mean number = 5.8, 95% CI = 5.7–5.8 vs 5.6, 95% CI = 5.5–5.7, <em>P</em> = .01, partial eta-squared = 0.02). After viewing messages intended to increase self-confidence in checking their skin accurately, they were also more likely to report greater intentions to do a skin check on a scale of 1–5 (mean number = 3.8, 95% CI = 3.7–3.9 vs 3.6, 95% CI = 3.4–3.7, <em>P</em> = .005, partial eta-squared = 0.02). Online melanoma messages aimed at increasing both melanoma knowledge and skin-check confidence may be most effective in improving the accuracy of skin self-examinations and intentions to do them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026723000796/pdfft?md5=118f40cd536db7b24ec4a6b4ddd14f1e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026723000796-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026723000796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rates of melanoma—the deadliest form of skin cancer—have increased. Early detection can save lives, and patients have a critical role to play in checking their skin. We aim to identify health communication messages that best educate the public and increase intentions toward skin checks. After viewing messages intended to increase melanoma knowledge, participants correctly identified a greater proportion (74.6 vs 70.4%) of moles (mean number = 17.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.5–18.3 vs 16.9, 95% CI = 16.6–17.3; P < .001, partial eta-squared = 0.03) and had knowledge of more melanoma warning signs (mean number = 5.8, 95% CI = 5.7–5.8 vs 5.6, 95% CI = 5.5–5.7, P = .01, partial eta-squared = 0.02). After viewing messages intended to increase self-confidence in checking their skin accurately, they were also more likely to report greater intentions to do a skin check on a scale of 1–5 (mean number = 3.8, 95% CI = 3.7–3.9 vs 3.6, 95% CI = 3.4–3.7, P = .005, partial eta-squared = 0.02). Online melanoma messages aimed at increasing both melanoma knowledge and skin-check confidence may be most effective in improving the accuracy of skin self-examinations and intentions to do them.

以证据为基础开展宣传,增加黑色素瘤知识和皮肤检查
黑色素瘤--最致命的皮肤癌--的发病率有所上升。早期发现可以挽救生命,而患者在检查皮肤方面起着至关重要的作用。我们的目标是找出最能教育公众并提高皮肤检查意向的健康传播信息。在观看了旨在增加黑色素瘤知识的信息后,参与者正确识别痣的比例(74.6% 对 70.4%)有所提高(平均数量 = 17.9,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 17.5-18.3 对 16.9,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 16.6)。9, 95% CI = 16.6-17.3; P < .001, partial eta-squared = 0.03),并了解更多的黑色素瘤警告标志(平均数量 = 5.8, 95% CI = 5.7-5.8 vs 5.6, 95% CI = 5.5-5.7, P = .01, partial eta-squared = 0.02)。在浏览了旨在增强准确检查皮肤的自信心的信息后,他们也更有可能表示更有意向在 1-5 级范围内进行皮肤检查(平均值 = 3.8,95% CI = 3.7-3.9 vs 3.6,95% CI = 3.4-3.7,P = .005,部分等差数 = 0.02)。旨在增加黑色素瘤知识和皮肤检查信心的在线黑色素瘤信息可能会最有效地提高皮肤自我检查的准确性和进行自我检查的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信