Comparison of Learning Outcomes Between the Merdeka Curriculum and the 2013 Curriculum in Pancasila and Citizenship Education Subjects at the Junior High School Level

Faula Yuniarta Seli, Rusnaini Rusnaini, Hassan Suryono
{"title":"Comparison of Learning Outcomes Between the Merdeka Curriculum and the 2013 Curriculum in Pancasila and Citizenship Education Subjects at the Junior High School Level","authors":"Faula Yuniarta Seli, Rusnaini Rusnaini, Hassan Suryono","doi":"10.18415/ijmmu.v10i12.5172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the learning outcomes of Civics subjects from different curricula, namely the independent curriculum and the 2013 curriculum, which can provide a clearer picture of the effectiveness of each curriculum in teaching Civics to students. The research method uses a quantitative approach with an ex post facto design. The research population was all students in SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta and SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta class VIII totaling 64 students. Sampling was done by simple random sampling technique. The data collection technique used in this study was primary data collection in the form of final semester exam results (UAS) in the even semester of the 2022/2023 school year. The data analysis technique uses inferential analysis techniques, namely the t-test, and the t-test used is the independent sample t-test. The results showed that the independent curriculum at SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta had higher learning outcomes, namely 86.32 compared to the 2013 curriculum learning outcomes at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta, namely 78.32.","PeriodicalId":14024,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i12.5172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the learning outcomes of Civics subjects from different curricula, namely the independent curriculum and the 2013 curriculum, which can provide a clearer picture of the effectiveness of each curriculum in teaching Civics to students. The research method uses a quantitative approach with an ex post facto design. The research population was all students in SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta and SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta class VIII totaling 64 students. Sampling was done by simple random sampling technique. The data collection technique used in this study was primary data collection in the form of final semester exam results (UAS) in the even semester of the 2022/2023 school year. The data analysis technique uses inferential analysis techniques, namely the t-test, and the t-test used is the independent sample t-test. The results showed that the independent curriculum at SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta had higher learning outcomes, namely 86.32 compared to the 2013 curriculum learning outcomes at SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta, namely 78.32.
比较默迪卡课程与 2013 年课程在初中班查希拉和公民教育科目中的学习成果
本研究旨在确定不同课程(即独立课程和 2013 年课程)的思品科目学习成果,从而更清晰地了解各课程在教授学生思品方面的成效。研究方法采用事后设计的定量方法。研究对象为苏腊卡尔塔第九中学(SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta)和苏腊卡尔塔第九中学(SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta)八年级的所有学生,共计 64 人。抽样采用简单随机抽样技术。本研究采用的数据收集技术是以 2022/2023 学年偶数学期的期末考试成绩(UAS)为形式的原始数据收集。数据分析技术采用推理分析技术,即 t 检验,使用的 t 检验是独立样本 t 检验。结果显示,泗水第九中学的独立课程学习成果(86.32)高于泗水第二十三中学的2013年课程学习成果(78.32)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信