Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Tes Mata Pelajaran PJOK Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)

Ari Afianto, Rifda El Fiah, N. Hidayah, Yudesta Erfayliana
{"title":"Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Tes Mata Pelajaran PJOK Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)","authors":"Ari Afianto, Rifda El Fiah, N. Hidayah, Yudesta Erfayliana","doi":"10.29240/jpd.v7i2.8496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted based on some problems that occur, namely the fact that when carrying out the teaching and learning process, students were still oriented towards the low order thinking skill (LOTS) and were not oriented towards the higher order thinking skills (HOTS) yet. In that case, instruments or questions were used during the evaluation process. In other words, measuring high order thinking skill has not been implemented yet, especially in physic (PJOK) subjects, so that teachers only focus on physical exercises in the field during the teaching and learning process. Teachers have not used physic (PJOK) assessments using HOTS yet. The type of research was research and development or R&D. This research referred to the Borg and Gall model which limited to 7 stages from the 10 stages including potential problems, data collection, product design, product validation, product revision, product testing, and design revision. The instrument used in this research was an assessment scale to determine the feasibility of the product and a Likert scale to determine the response of teachers and students to the feasibility and attractiveness of the product. The data analysis carried out was collecting data from validation results done by assessment experts, language experts, material experts and media experts, teachers and elementary students. The result of analysis showed that questions and tests based on higher order thinking skills (HOTS) for class V physic subject (PJOK) was developed \"Very decent or Very interesting\" to be used as a measuring tool for students in training their high order thinking skills. These results were obtained based on validation from assessment experts, material experts, language experts and material experts. The assessment results from the assessment experts showed the \"Very decent\" category with a percentage value of 92.5%. The results of the material expert assessment reached the \"Very decent\" category with a percentage value obtained of 90%. Then, the results of the language expert’s assessment reached the \"Very decent\" category with the percentage value obtained reaching 92.25%.","PeriodicalId":503925,"journal":{"name":"AR-RIAYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AR-RIAYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29240/jpd.v7i2.8496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was conducted based on some problems that occur, namely the fact that when carrying out the teaching and learning process, students were still oriented towards the low order thinking skill (LOTS) and were not oriented towards the higher order thinking skills (HOTS) yet. In that case, instruments or questions were used during the evaluation process. In other words, measuring high order thinking skill has not been implemented yet, especially in physic (PJOK) subjects, so that teachers only focus on physical exercises in the field during the teaching and learning process. Teachers have not used physic (PJOK) assessments using HOTS yet. The type of research was research and development or R&D. This research referred to the Borg and Gall model which limited to 7 stages from the 10 stages including potential problems, data collection, product design, product validation, product revision, product testing, and design revision. The instrument used in this research was an assessment scale to determine the feasibility of the product and a Likert scale to determine the response of teachers and students to the feasibility and attractiveness of the product. The data analysis carried out was collecting data from validation results done by assessment experts, language experts, material experts and media experts, teachers and elementary students. The result of analysis showed that questions and tests based on higher order thinking skills (HOTS) for class V physic subject (PJOK) was developed "Very decent or Very interesting" to be used as a measuring tool for students in training their high order thinking skills. These results were obtained based on validation from assessment experts, material experts, language experts and material experts. The assessment results from the assessment experts showed the "Very decent" category with a percentage value of 92.5%. The results of the material expert assessment reached the "Very decent" category with a percentage value obtained of 90%. Then, the results of the language expert’s assessment reached the "Very decent" category with the percentage value obtained reaching 92.25%.
基于高阶思维能力(HOTS)的 PJOK 学科测试工具的开发
这项研究是基于出现的一些问题开展的,即在开展教学和学习过程中,学生仍然偏向于低阶思维技能(LOTS),而尚未偏向于高阶思维技能(HOTS)。在这种情况下,在评价过程中使用了工具或问题。换句话说,高阶思维能力的测量尚未实施,尤其是在物理(PJOK)科目中,因此教师在教学过程中只关注实地的物理练习。教师尚未使用 HOTS 进行物理(PJOK)评估。研究类型为研究与开发或研发。这项研究参考了 Borg 和 Gall 模型,该模型将 10 个阶段限定为 7 个阶段,包括潜在问题、数据收集、产品设计、产品验证、产品修订、产品测试和设计修订。本研究使用的工具是评估量表,用于确定产品的可行性,以及李克特量表,用于确定教师和学生对产品的可行性和吸引力的反应。数据分析是从评估专家、语言专家、教材专家、媒体专家、教师和小学生的验证结果中收集数据。分析结果表明,为五年级物理学科(PJOK)开发的基于高阶思维能力(HOTS)的问题和测试 "非常得体或非常有趣",可用作学生训练高阶思维能力的测量工具。这些结果是在评估专家、材料专家、语言专家和材料专家的验证基础上得出的。评估专家的评估结果显示,"非常得体 "类别的百分比值为 92.5%。材料专家的评估结果为 "非常好",百分比为 90%。语言专家的评估结果为 "非常好",百分比为 92.25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信