The Descendants of Lithuanian Immigrants in Kazakhstan: Contours of Ethnic Identity

J. Kuznecovienė
{"title":"The Descendants of Lithuanian Immigrants in Kazakhstan: Contours of Ethnic Identity","authors":"J. Kuznecovienė","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2023.34.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on the forced migration of Lithuanians to the east of the former Soviet Union in the 1940s and early 1950s throws up a wide range of issues. Methodologically, most of such studies are similar in terms of the sample chosen, which consists of the former prisoners of gulags and exiles who have returned to Lithuania, but it usually disregards those who stayed. Accordingly, the Lithuanian diasporas that emerged in the east after the forced migration, including in Kazakhstan, have not been studied in detail. In this article, our aim is to answer the questions of how and in what private and public contexts processes of the ethnic identification of the Lithuanian diaspora in Kazakhstan are determined, how ethnic boundaries are drawn, and what cultural and social resources are used for this purpose. As the research revealed, the conceptualisation of ethnicity implied by the Kazakhstan state that has been adopted by our informants eliminates its cultural content, or at most reduces it to forms evident in festive culture, as well as the need and possibilities for its expression. As a result, ethnic identity is constructed on the basis of what is almost the sole criterion: Lithuanian descent in the form of ‘root’ or ‘blood’. For most of our informants, ‘roots’ are just a fact of origin, as shown in the practice of entering Lithuanian ethnicity in personal documents, an officially required practice which does not have and does not presuppose any enactment of ethno-cultural differences. Ethnicity, which is seen as ‘in-rooted’ but also as culture-less and as muted by a doubling of roots among ethnically mixed families of origin, enables a whole spectrum of manipulations of ethnic identity. One such manipulation is attempting to profit from the Lithuanian ethnic identity by turning it into a resource for acquiring benefits. The practice of profiteering from the Lithuanian ethnic identity, and thus its transformation into a resource for gaining benefits in the forms of Lithuanian citizenship and a hope of being repatriated to Lithuania, is probably the most frequent factor in becoming Lithuanian by remembering Lithuanian roots and activating the Lithuanian ethnic identity.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija. Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2023.34.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the forced migration of Lithuanians to the east of the former Soviet Union in the 1940s and early 1950s throws up a wide range of issues. Methodologically, most of such studies are similar in terms of the sample chosen, which consists of the former prisoners of gulags and exiles who have returned to Lithuania, but it usually disregards those who stayed. Accordingly, the Lithuanian diasporas that emerged in the east after the forced migration, including in Kazakhstan, have not been studied in detail. In this article, our aim is to answer the questions of how and in what private and public contexts processes of the ethnic identification of the Lithuanian diaspora in Kazakhstan are determined, how ethnic boundaries are drawn, and what cultural and social resources are used for this purpose. As the research revealed, the conceptualisation of ethnicity implied by the Kazakhstan state that has been adopted by our informants eliminates its cultural content, or at most reduces it to forms evident in festive culture, as well as the need and possibilities for its expression. As a result, ethnic identity is constructed on the basis of what is almost the sole criterion: Lithuanian descent in the form of ‘root’ or ‘blood’. For most of our informants, ‘roots’ are just a fact of origin, as shown in the practice of entering Lithuanian ethnicity in personal documents, an officially required practice which does not have and does not presuppose any enactment of ethno-cultural differences. Ethnicity, which is seen as ‘in-rooted’ but also as culture-less and as muted by a doubling of roots among ethnically mixed families of origin, enables a whole spectrum of manipulations of ethnic identity. One such manipulation is attempting to profit from the Lithuanian ethnic identity by turning it into a resource for acquiring benefits. The practice of profiteering from the Lithuanian ethnic identity, and thus its transformation into a resource for gaining benefits in the forms of Lithuanian citizenship and a hope of being repatriated to Lithuania, is probably the most frequent factor in becoming Lithuanian by remembering Lithuanian roots and activating the Lithuanian ethnic identity.
哈萨克斯坦的立陶宛移民后裔:民族身份的轮廓
关于 20 世纪 40 年代和 50 年代初立陶宛人被迫移民到前苏联东部的研究提出了一系列问题。从方法论上讲,大多数此类研究在样本选择上是相似的,都是由古拉格集中营的前囚犯和返回立陶宛的流亡者组成,但通常忽略了那些留在立陶宛的人。因此,对被迫移民后在东部地区(包括哈萨克斯坦)出现的立陶宛侨民还没有进行详细研究。在本文中,我们的目的是回答以下问题:在哈萨克斯坦,立陶宛侨民的民族识别过程是如何确定的,在什么样的私人和公共背景下确定的,民族界限是如何划定的,以及为此目的使用了哪些文化和社会资源。研究表明,我们的受访者所采用的哈萨克斯坦国家所暗示的民族概念消除了其文化内涵,或最多将其简化为节日文化中显而易见的形式,以及其表达的必要性和可能性。因此,民族身份是在几乎是唯一标准的基础上建立起来的:根 "或 "血缘 "形式的立陶宛血统。对我们的大多数受访者来说,"根 "只是一个来源的事实,在个人证件中填写立陶宛族的做法就说明了这一点,这是官方要求的做法,并不存在也不预示着任何民族文化差异的形成。种族被视为 "根深蒂固 "的,但也被视为没有文化的,而且在种族混杂的原籍家庭中,由于根的双重性,种族被弱化了,这就使得对种族身份的各种操纵成为可能。其中一种操纵方式就是试图利用立陶宛的民族身份,将其转化为获取利益的资源。从立陶宛族身份中获利,从而将其转化为一种资源,以立陶宛公民身份和被遣返立陶宛的希望等形式获取利益,这种做法可能是通过铭记立陶宛根和激活立陶宛族身份而成为立陶宛人的最常见因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信