MEROVINGIAN MEDICINE BETWEEN PRACTICAL ART AND PHILOSOPHY

Traditio Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1017/tdo.2023.6
James T. Palmer
{"title":"MEROVINGIAN MEDICINE BETWEEN PRACTICAL ART AND PHILOSOPHY","authors":"James T. Palmer","doi":"10.1017/tdo.2023.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay offers a new examination of medical knowledge in Merovingian Gaul (c. 500–c.750), the ways that it became part of non-specialized learning, and its continuities with Carolingian medicine. In most histories of medicine, the Merovingian world is portrayed as providing a hostile environment for medicine due to the Christianization of knowledge. A significant problem, however, is that there has been no study of what medicine was known or how it was treated since 1937, and even that study can now be seen to be built on false premises. The first part of the present paper offers a new conspectus of Merovingian medical knowledge based on the earliest manuscripts and argues that this new overview changes where we can see continuities in content and practice with Carolingian medicine. The second part builds on this to explore the intersections between religious and secular study, and how medicine fitted within a generalist rather than specialist education. The final section looks at how this learning complemented understandings of the miraculous and nature and in the process helped to deal with challenges from folk practice and the failures of medicine to offer effective aid during pandemics. It is concluded that medicine was in good health in the Merovingian period as it contributed useful ways to see natural order in Creation.","PeriodicalId":510537,"journal":{"name":"Traditio","volume":"129 ","pages":"17 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traditio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/tdo.2023.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay offers a new examination of medical knowledge in Merovingian Gaul (c. 500–c.750), the ways that it became part of non-specialized learning, and its continuities with Carolingian medicine. In most histories of medicine, the Merovingian world is portrayed as providing a hostile environment for medicine due to the Christianization of knowledge. A significant problem, however, is that there has been no study of what medicine was known or how it was treated since 1937, and even that study can now be seen to be built on false premises. The first part of the present paper offers a new conspectus of Merovingian medical knowledge based on the earliest manuscripts and argues that this new overview changes where we can see continuities in content and practice with Carolingian medicine. The second part builds on this to explore the intersections between religious and secular study, and how medicine fitted within a generalist rather than specialist education. The final section looks at how this learning complemented understandings of the miraculous and nature and in the process helped to deal with challenges from folk practice and the failures of medicine to offer effective aid during pandemics. It is concluded that medicine was in good health in the Merovingian period as it contributed useful ways to see natural order in Creation.
介于实用艺术和哲学之间的梅洛文医学
这篇文章对梅洛文王朝高卢(约 500 年至 750 年)的医学知识、医学知识成为非专业学习一部分的方式及其与卡洛林王朝医学的连续性进行了新的研究。在大多数医学史中,由于知识的基督教化,墨洛温世界被描绘成一个对医学不利的环境。然而,一个重要的问题是,自 1937 年以来,一直没有对医学的知识或如何对待医学进行过研究,甚至现在可以看到,这种研究也是建立在错误的前提之上。本文的第一部分以最早的手稿为基础,对墨洛温时期的医学知识进行了新的梳理,并认为这一新的梳理改变了我们在内容和实践方面与加洛林王朝医学的连续性。第二部分在此基础上探讨了宗教学习与世俗学习之间的交叉,以及医学如何融入通才教育而非专才教育。最后一部分探讨了这种学习如何与对奇迹和自然的理解相辅相成,并在此过程中帮助应对来自民间实践的挑战以及医学在大流行病期间未能提供有效援助的问题。最后的结论是,医学在墨洛温王朝时期发展良好,因为它为人们认识造物的自然秩序提供了有用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信