Electronic evidence in civil litigation: legal characteristics and particularities

Nataliia Zilnyk, Maryna Khymynets
{"title":"Electronic evidence in civil litigation: legal characteristics and particularities","authors":"Nataliia Zilnyk, Maryna Khymynets","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This article is dedicated to the study of issues related to the use of electronic evidence in civil litigation. Within the framework of the article, an analysis of recent scientific publications on the use of electronic evidence is conducted. The work was performed on the basis of general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge. The general concept and principles of using electronic evidence in civil proceedings, their characteristics, and peculiarities are outlined. A list of advantages regarding the use of electronic evidence is provided. Special attention is given to the description of the procedure for submitting electronic evidence to the court. The article examines changes and trends in the use of electronic evidence in the modern context of integration and digitization of society, and analyzes progress in the field of information technology. Problems at the legislative level concerning the submission of both original electronic evidence and their copies to the court are analyzed. Issues related to the procedure and peculiarities of examining electronic evidence, as well as their evaluation by the court, are identified. Specifically, among the problems identified in the article are the insufficient regulatory framework for certifying electronic copies of electronic evidence, the imperfect definition of the concepts of «original electronic evidence» and «copy of electronic evidence» in legislation, the instability of electronic information, the absence of physical form and perception only through special technical devices, the possibility of theft, damage, and tampering, and the determination of their authenticity and admissibility. Based on the conducted research, the conclusion is drawn that the question of the use of electronic evidence requires urgent resolution, and the legislator should promptly eliminate existing contradictions by making appropriate amendments to the current procedural legislation of our country. Moreover, it is advisable to more precisely define the concept of «electronic evidence» and the specifics of their submission at the legislative level.","PeriodicalId":505933,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"154 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. This article is dedicated to the study of issues related to the use of electronic evidence in civil litigation. Within the framework of the article, an analysis of recent scientific publications on the use of electronic evidence is conducted. The work was performed on the basis of general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge. The general concept and principles of using electronic evidence in civil proceedings, their characteristics, and peculiarities are outlined. A list of advantages regarding the use of electronic evidence is provided. Special attention is given to the description of the procedure for submitting electronic evidence to the court. The article examines changes and trends in the use of electronic evidence in the modern context of integration and digitization of society, and analyzes progress in the field of information technology. Problems at the legislative level concerning the submission of both original electronic evidence and their copies to the court are analyzed. Issues related to the procedure and peculiarities of examining electronic evidence, as well as their evaluation by the court, are identified. Specifically, among the problems identified in the article are the insufficient regulatory framework for certifying electronic copies of electronic evidence, the imperfect definition of the concepts of «original electronic evidence» and «copy of electronic evidence» in legislation, the instability of electronic information, the absence of physical form and perception only through special technical devices, the possibility of theft, damage, and tampering, and the determination of their authenticity and admissibility. Based on the conducted research, the conclusion is drawn that the question of the use of electronic evidence requires urgent resolution, and the legislator should promptly eliminate existing contradictions by making appropriate amendments to the current procedural legislation of our country. Moreover, it is advisable to more precisely define the concept of «electronic evidence» and the specifics of their submission at the legislative level.
民事诉讼中的电子证据:法律特点和特殊性
摘要。本文致力于研究与民事诉讼中使用电子证据有关的问题。在文章框架内,对近期有关电子证据使用的科学出版物进行了分析。这项工作是在一般科学知识和特殊科学知识方法的基础上进行的。文章概述了在民事诉讼中使用电子证据的一般概念和原则、其特点和特殊性。列举了使用电子证据的优势。特别关注了向法院提交电子证据的程序说明。文章探讨了在社会一体化和数字化的现代背景下使用电子证据的变化和趋势,并分析了信息技术领域的进步。文章分析了向法院提交电子证据原件及其副本的立法问题。确定了与审查电子证据的程序和特殊性以及法院对其进行评估有关的问题。具体而言,文章指出的问题包括:认证电子证据电子副本的监管框架不足;立法对 "电子证据原件 "和 "电子证据副本 "概念的定义不完善;电子信息不稳定、无实物形态且只能通过特殊技术设备感知;被盗、损坏和篡改的可能性;以及确定其真实性和可采性。根据研究得出的结论是,电子证据的使用问题亟待解决,立法者应立即消除现有矛盾,对我国现行诉讼法进行适当修订。此外,最好在立法层面更准确地界定 "电子证据 "的概念及其提交的具体细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信