A Political Theology of Interpellation: On Subjection, Individuation, and Becoming Nothing

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Alex Dubilet
{"title":"A Political Theology of Interpellation: On Subjection, Individuation, and Becoming Nothing","authors":"Alex Dubilet","doi":"10.1353/cul.2024.a915449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay argues for the political-theological significance of Louis Althusser's theory of interpellation by analyzing the import of the \"Christian religious ideology\" in his argument. It suggests that the subject as a complex dispositif—of (self-)recognition in relation to a transcendent call, which bestows a proper name, a place in the world, and freedom in obedience—anchors both the Christian and the secular domains. In reconstructing the subject's constitutive elements, this essay argues that interpellation does not merely recruit individuals but itself acts as an operation of individuation. Moreover, the interpellative matrix of the subject works as a sorting mechanism that segregates those who cohere as subjects from those who do not. Turning to the fourteenth-century mystical figure Meister Eckhart, the essay theorizes deinterpellation as a delegitimating force against the interplays of transcendence and subjection wherever they are operative. Rather than opening the self to a transcendent call, Eckhartian deinterpellative becoming nothing affirms an anoriginary freedom detached from the entire matrix uniting interpellative transcendence and the subject.","PeriodicalId":46410,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Critique","volume":"161 4","pages":"132 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2024.a915449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay argues for the political-theological significance of Louis Althusser's theory of interpellation by analyzing the import of the "Christian religious ideology" in his argument. It suggests that the subject as a complex dispositif—of (self-)recognition in relation to a transcendent call, which bestows a proper name, a place in the world, and freedom in obedience—anchors both the Christian and the secular domains. In reconstructing the subject's constitutive elements, this essay argues that interpellation does not merely recruit individuals but itself acts as an operation of individuation. Moreover, the interpellative matrix of the subject works as a sorting mechanism that segregates those who cohere as subjects from those who do not. Turning to the fourteenth-century mystical figure Meister Eckhart, the essay theorizes deinterpellation as a delegitimating force against the interplays of transcendence and subjection wherever they are operative. Rather than opening the self to a transcendent call, Eckhartian deinterpellative becoming nothing affirms an anoriginary freedom detached from the entire matrix uniting interpellative transcendence and the subject.
互称的政治神学:论臣服、个体化和虚无化
摘要:本文通过分析路易-阿尔都塞的 "互称 "理论中 "基督教宗教意识形态 "的重要性,论证了这一理论的政治神学意义。文章认为,主体作为一种复杂的可支配性--与超验的召唤相关的(自我)承认,它赋予了一个恰当的名称、在世界上的位置以及服从中的自由--既支撑着基督教领域,也支撑着世俗领域。在重构主体的构成要素时,本文认为,"互称 "并不仅仅是招募个体,其本身也是一种个体化的运作。此外,主体的互称矩阵是一种分拣机制,它将作为主体的人与非主体的人区分开来。文章以十四世纪的神秘主义人物迈斯特-艾克哈特(Meister Eckhart)为例,从理论上将 "去中介化 "视为一种去合法化的力量,以对抗超越与臣服的相互作用。艾克哈特的 "去中介化 "非但没有向超越的召唤敞开自我,反而肯定了一种脱离中介性超越与主体之间的整个矩阵的原初自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cultural Critique
Cultural Critique Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Cultural Critique provides a forum for international and interdisciplinary explorations of intellectual controversies, trends, and issues in culture, theory, and politics. Emphasizing critique rather than criticism, the journal draws on the diverse and conflictual approaches of Marxism, feminism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, political economy, and hermeneutics to offer readings in society and its transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信