Content Analysis of Lexical Cohesive Devices in the Lectures of the Minister of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the Raisi Government in The Field of Health Care, Treatment and Health

Yousef Hazrati
{"title":"Content Analysis of Lexical Cohesive Devices in the Lectures of the Minister of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the Raisi Government in The Field of Health Care, Treatment and Health","authors":"Yousef Hazrati","doi":"10.18415/ijmmu.v10i12.5446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current research, the content of the lectures of the Minister of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the Raisi government in the field of health care, treatment and health were analyzed from the perspective of the use of lexical cohesive devices and in the framework of role oriented of Haliday and Hassan (1976). The research was conducted in a descriptive and analytical way, and the content was three lectures in the field of health care, treatment and health, which were randomly selected. Lexical cohesive devices were extracted in three lectures and their frequency was measured. The percent of occurrence of each device was also obtained. After examining the data, it was found that the first lecture with 261 cases, the third lecture with 254 cases and the second lecture with 246 cases are in the first to third ranks, respectively, in the use of cohesion devices. In the first speech, collocation was the most used cohesive device and hyponymy was the least used device. In the second speech, repetition and hyponymy were respectively the most and the least cohesive devices used in this lecture and in the third lecture, collocation was the most and hyponymy was the least device used. In order to perform a more detailed statistical analysis and find significance in the distribution of cohesive devices in each of the lectures, the chi-square test was used. Based on the results obtained at level (p<0, 0/05) there is a significant difference between the distribution of cohesive devices used in each of the lectures.","PeriodicalId":14024,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","volume":"87 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i12.5446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current research, the content of the lectures of the Minister of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the Raisi government in the field of health care, treatment and health were analyzed from the perspective of the use of lexical cohesive devices and in the framework of role oriented of Haliday and Hassan (1976). The research was conducted in a descriptive and analytical way, and the content was three lectures in the field of health care, treatment and health, which were randomly selected. Lexical cohesive devices were extracted in three lectures and their frequency was measured. The percent of occurrence of each device was also obtained. After examining the data, it was found that the first lecture with 261 cases, the third lecture with 254 cases and the second lecture with 246 cases are in the first to third ranks, respectively, in the use of cohesion devices. In the first speech, collocation was the most used cohesive device and hyponymy was the least used device. In the second speech, repetition and hyponymy were respectively the most and the least cohesive devices used in this lecture and in the third lecture, collocation was the most and hyponymy was the least device used. In order to perform a more detailed statistical analysis and find significance in the distribution of cohesive devices in each of the lectures, the chi-square test was used. Based on the results obtained at level (p<0, 0/05) there is a significant difference between the distribution of cohesive devices used in each of the lectures.
拉伊西政府卫生、治疗和医学教育部长在保健、治疗和健康领域的讲座中的词汇粘合工具内容分析
在本研究中,我们从词汇连贯手段的使用角度出发,在哈利戴和哈桑(1976 年)的角色导向框架下,分析了拉伊西政府卫生、治疗和医学教育部长在保健、治疗和健康领域的讲座内容。研究以描述性和分析性的方式进行,研究内容是随机选取的三个关于保健、治疗和健康领域的讲座。研究人员提取了三个讲座中的词汇连贯手段,并对其频率进行了测量。同时还得出了每种手段出现的百分比。对数据进行分析后发现,第一讲(261 例)、第三讲(254 例)和第二讲(246 例)在连贯手段的使用上分别排在第一至第三位。在第一讲中,搭配是使用最多的连接手段,而连词是使用最少的连接手段。在第二篇演讲中,重复和连词分别是使用最多和最少的内聚手段;在第三篇演讲中,搭配是使用最多的内聚手段,连词是使用最少的内聚手段。为了进行更详细的统计分析,并发现每个讲座中连贯手段分布的显著性,我们使用了卡方检验。根据水平(p<0,0/05)得出的结果,各讲座中使用的连贯手段的分布存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信