Evaluasi Perspektif Pengguna Terhadap Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten X)

I. Subroto, Beta A. A. Uliansyah
{"title":"Evaluasi Perspektif Pengguna Terhadap Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten X)","authors":"I. Subroto, Beta A. A. Uliansyah","doi":"10.31092/jmkp.v7i2.2578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changing the SIMDA application to SIPD requires operators to adapt. This research aims to evaluate the implementation of SIPD in District X using the System Usability Scale (SUS) method and the Delone and Mclean Success Model. Then to find out which parts must be maintained and which must be improved using the Delone and Mclean Success Model. This research uses a mix method, through quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics followed by qualitative analysis using interviews. There are three types of information systems in SIPD, regional development information systems, regional financial information systems, and other regional government information systems. The SUS results show that these three types of SIPD have not been fully accepted by operators. An information system that is considered to be newly implemented is one of the factors why this information system has not been well received by users. The results of the analysis using the DeLone and McLean success model also show results that support the SUS analysis. The aspect that received the lowest score was the quality aspect of the information system. Meanwhile, the aspect that is considered the most satisfying is the service quality aspect. Services in the form of technical guidance have been provided by SIPD developers, but this needs to be done intensively, especially if there is an update to the information system. The suggestion from this research is that SIPD developers should provide more intensive technical guidance to operators and develop SIPD so that it is integrated with other applications.","PeriodicalId":113472,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL MANAJEMEN KEUANGAN PUBLIK","volume":"41 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL MANAJEMEN KEUANGAN PUBLIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31092/jmkp.v7i2.2578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changing the SIMDA application to SIPD requires operators to adapt. This research aims to evaluate the implementation of SIPD in District X using the System Usability Scale (SUS) method and the Delone and Mclean Success Model. Then to find out which parts must be maintained and which must be improved using the Delone and Mclean Success Model. This research uses a mix method, through quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics followed by qualitative analysis using interviews. There are three types of information systems in SIPD, regional development information systems, regional financial information systems, and other regional government information systems. The SUS results show that these three types of SIPD have not been fully accepted by operators. An information system that is considered to be newly implemented is one of the factors why this information system has not been well received by users. The results of the analysis using the DeLone and McLean success model also show results that support the SUS analysis. The aspect that received the lowest score was the quality aspect of the information system. Meanwhile, the aspect that is considered the most satisfying is the service quality aspect. Services in the form of technical guidance have been provided by SIPD developers, but this needs to be done intensively, especially if there is an update to the information system. The suggestion from this research is that SIPD developers should provide more intensive technical guidance to operators and develop SIPD so that it is integrated with other applications.
评估用户对地方政府信息系统的看法(X 区案例研究)
将 SIMDA 应用程序改为 SIPD 需要操作员进行调整。本研究旨在使用系统可用性量表(SUS)方法和 Delone 与 Mclean 成功模型评估 SIPD 在 X 区的实施情况。然后使用 Delone 和 Mclean 成功模型找出哪些部分必须保持,哪些部分必须改进。本研究采用混合方法,通过描述性统计进行定量分析,然后通过访谈进行定性分析。苏州工业园区有三类信息系统,即区域发展信息系统、区域金融信息系统和其他区域政府信息系统。SUS 的结果表明,这三类 SIPD 并未被运营商完全接受。信息系统被认为是新实施的,这也是该信息系统不受用户欢迎的原因之一。使用 DeLone 和 McLean 成功模型进行分析的结果也显示了支持 SUS 分析的结果。得分最低的方面是信息系统的质量方面。同时,被认为最令人满意的方面是服务质量方面。SIPD 开发人员提供了技术指导形式的服务,但这种服务还需要加强,特别是在信息系统更新时。这项研究提出的建议是,SIPD 开发商应向运营商提供更深入的技术指导,并开发 SIPD,使其与其他应用程序集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信