Comparative analysis of the effect of Reamberin and Methadoxyl on the course of acute severe ethanol poisoning

T. N. Savateeva-Lyubimova, A. G. Aleksandrov, S. B. Kazakova, K. Stosman
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the effect of Reamberin and Methadoxyl on the course of acute severe ethanol poisoning","authors":"T. N. Savateeva-Lyubimova, A. G. Aleksandrov, S. B. Kazakova, K. Stosman","doi":"10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-6-59-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. One of the ways to improve the quality of intensive therapy in severe forms of acute alcohol poisoning is the inclusion in the complex of measures of means capable of reducing the manifestations of oxidative stress.   The aim of the work was a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of drugs Reamberin and Methadoxyl in acute severe ethanol poisoning on rats.   Materials and methods. Acute severe alcohol poisoning was modeled in Wistar rats by 40 % ethanol solution at a dose 8,6 g/kg. The studied drugs were administered infusively in the volume of 20 ml/kg for 60 min at an average rate of 0.33 ml/min/kg. The comparative efficacy of infusion therapy was evaluated according to the severity of coma and its duration.   Results. Ethanol caused coma of different severity in animals. At the end of infusion therapy, the death of some animals was observed. The life expectancy of dead animals receiving Reamberin was 4 times higher than that of animals of the control group and animals receiving Metadoxyl. The most significant decrease in the severity of coma and its duration was observed in rats receiving Reamberin. Minimal differences in the frequency of respiratory movements from the background at the end of infusion occurred in the same animals. Discussion Established in acute ethanol poisoning the presence of supportive therapy with Reamberin of neurological status and external respiratory function during infusion is a justification for the inclusion of the drug in the complex of intensive care in this critical condition.   Conclusions. It was experimentally shown that Reamberin, unlike Methadoxyl, significantly reduced the severity of alcohol coma at the end of infusion administration. Reamberin increased the life expectancy of dead animals compared to the control and rats receiving Methadoxyl, and also caused minimal differences in respiratory rate relative to the background at the end of infusion, which had the character of a trend. Reamberin demonstrated greater efficacy with respect to the course of acute severe ethanol poisoning than Methadoxyl.","PeriodicalId":247511,"journal":{"name":"Ural Medical Journal","volume":"178 S439","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ural Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-6-59-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. One of the ways to improve the quality of intensive therapy in severe forms of acute alcohol poisoning is the inclusion in the complex of measures of means capable of reducing the manifestations of oxidative stress.   The aim of the work was a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of drugs Reamberin and Methadoxyl in acute severe ethanol poisoning on rats.   Materials and methods. Acute severe alcohol poisoning was modeled in Wistar rats by 40 % ethanol solution at a dose 8,6 g/kg. The studied drugs were administered infusively in the volume of 20 ml/kg for 60 min at an average rate of 0.33 ml/min/kg. The comparative efficacy of infusion therapy was evaluated according to the severity of coma and its duration.   Results. Ethanol caused coma of different severity in animals. At the end of infusion therapy, the death of some animals was observed. The life expectancy of dead animals receiving Reamberin was 4 times higher than that of animals of the control group and animals receiving Metadoxyl. The most significant decrease in the severity of coma and its duration was observed in rats receiving Reamberin. Minimal differences in the frequency of respiratory movements from the background at the end of infusion occurred in the same animals. Discussion Established in acute ethanol poisoning the presence of supportive therapy with Reamberin of neurological status and external respiratory function during infusion is a justification for the inclusion of the drug in the complex of intensive care in this critical condition.   Conclusions. It was experimentally shown that Reamberin, unlike Methadoxyl, significantly reduced the severity of alcohol coma at the end of infusion administration. Reamberin increased the life expectancy of dead animals compared to the control and rats receiving Methadoxyl, and also caused minimal differences in respiratory rate relative to the background at the end of infusion, which had the character of a trend. Reamberin demonstrated greater efficacy with respect to the course of acute severe ethanol poisoning than Methadoxyl.
兰贝林和甲氧苄啶对急性严重乙醇中毒病程影响的比较分析
导言。提高严重急性酒精中毒强化治疗质量的方法之一是在综合措施中加入能够减少氧化应激表现的手段。 这项研究的目的是比较评估药物兰贝林和甲氧苄啶对急性严重乙醇中毒大鼠的疗效。 材料和方法以 40% 的乙醇溶液(剂量为 8.6 克/千克)模拟 Wistar 大鼠急性严重酒精中毒。以平均 0.33 毫升/分钟/千克的速度,按 20 毫升/千克的容量输注所研究的药物 60 分钟。根据昏迷的严重程度和持续时间对输液疗法的疗效进行了比较评估。 结果如下乙醇导致动物出现不同程度的昏迷。在输注治疗结束时,观察到一些动物死亡。接受兰贝林治疗的死亡动物的预期寿命是对照组和接受美他多辛治疗的动物的4倍。接受兰贝林治疗的大鼠昏迷严重程度和持续时间明显减少。同样的动物在输注结束时的呼吸运动频率与本底相比差异很小。讨论 在急性乙醇中毒中,输液期间使用兰贝林对神经系统状态和外部呼吸功能进行支持性治疗,是在这种危急情况下将该药物纳入重症监护综合方案的正当理由。 结论实验表明,与甲氧苄啶不同,兰贝林能显著减轻输液结束时酒精昏迷的严重程度。与对照组和接受甲氧苄啶治疗的大鼠相比,兰贝林延长了死亡动物的预期寿命,而且在输液结束时,呼吸频率相对于背景的差异极小,具有趋势性。与甲氧苄啶相比,兰贝林对急性严重乙醇中毒的疗效更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信