{"title":"Biografie rivisitate. Il caso Yeats-Ellis","authors":"Arianna Antonielli","doi":"10.36253/lea-1824-484x-14932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After collaborating on The Works of William Blake. Poetic, Symbolic, and Critical (1893), William Butler Yeats and Edwin John Ellis individually published additional volumes on William Blake. These editions trace the contours of each editor’s unique approach to William Blake’s works, revealing a fascinating tension between mysticism and scholarship. The apparent clash of their perspectives not only influenced the selection and interpretation of Blake’s poetry, but also interestingly shaped their biographies of Blake. The current essay looks at Yeats and Ellis’ distinct authorial intent, taking their biographies of Blake as case studies to outline the growing controversy between the two editors. This divergence highlights the multifaceted nature of Blake’s legacy and the ongoing debate on the most appropriate lens through which to view his life and work.","PeriodicalId":383989,"journal":{"name":"LEA - Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEA - Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/lea-1824-484x-14932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After collaborating on The Works of William Blake. Poetic, Symbolic, and Critical (1893), William Butler Yeats and Edwin John Ellis individually published additional volumes on William Blake. These editions trace the contours of each editor’s unique approach to William Blake’s works, revealing a fascinating tension between mysticism and scholarship. The apparent clash of their perspectives not only influenced the selection and interpretation of Blake’s poetry, but also interestingly shaped their biographies of Blake. The current essay looks at Yeats and Ellis’ distinct authorial intent, taking their biographies of Blake as case studies to outline the growing controversy between the two editors. This divergence highlights the multifaceted nature of Blake’s legacy and the ongoing debate on the most appropriate lens through which to view his life and work.
在合作出版《威廉-布莱克作品集》(The Works of William Blake.诗意的、象征的和批判的》(1893 年)之后,威廉-巴特勒-叶芝和埃德温-约翰-埃利斯又分别出版了关于威廉-布莱克的其他作品集。这些版本追溯了每位编辑对威廉-布莱克作品的独特研究方法,揭示了神秘主义与学术研究之间引人入胜的紧张关系。他们观点的明显冲突不仅影响了布莱克诗歌的选择和诠释,还有趣地塑造了他们的布莱克传记。这篇文章探讨了叶芝和埃利斯不同的创作意图,以他们的布莱克传记为案例,概述了两位编辑之间日益激烈的争论。这种分歧凸显了布莱克遗产的多面性,以及关于从哪个角度看待布莱克的生活和作品最合适的争论。