Battery Electric Vehicles: How Many Gears? A Technical–Economic Analysis

Vehicles Pub Date : 2023-12-25 DOI:10.3390/vehicles6010003
Emmanuele Bertucci, F. Bucchi, M. Ceraolo, Francesco Frendo, G. Lutzemberger
{"title":"Battery Electric Vehicles: How Many Gears? A Technical–Economic Analysis","authors":"Emmanuele Bertucci, F. Bucchi, M. Ceraolo, Francesco Frendo, G. Lutzemberger","doi":"10.3390/vehicles6010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The large majority of electric cars have a single-speed gearbox, because electrified powertrains provide maximal power across a wide operating range, and single-speed simplifies construction and reduces capital costs. Nevertheless, multi-speed transmissions have also been developed for electric cars, and some of them have recently appeared as commercial products. This paper aims to compare, through some practical examples, solutions with single-speed and dual-speed transmissions. In particular, given the very smooth driving of electric cars, for dual-speed solutions, a dual-clutch gearbox was considered. Finally, a continuously variable transmission (CVT) was also used. Different solutions were analyzed from a technical–economic point of view, based on a simulation of the vehicle under standardized driving cycles, thus evaluating the capital and running electricity costs. The obtained results show that the comparison between the two solutions is very open, and in the majority of cases, the advantages in terms of efficiency overcome the disadvantages due to the additional capital costs. For a rather low battery cost of 150 €/kWh, the total cost reduction moves from about 100–150 € up to 1500–2000 €, depending on the electricity cost, along the whole vehicle lifespan.","PeriodicalId":509694,"journal":{"name":"Vehicles","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles6010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large majority of electric cars have a single-speed gearbox, because electrified powertrains provide maximal power across a wide operating range, and single-speed simplifies construction and reduces capital costs. Nevertheless, multi-speed transmissions have also been developed for electric cars, and some of them have recently appeared as commercial products. This paper aims to compare, through some practical examples, solutions with single-speed and dual-speed transmissions. In particular, given the very smooth driving of electric cars, for dual-speed solutions, a dual-clutch gearbox was considered. Finally, a continuously variable transmission (CVT) was also used. Different solutions were analyzed from a technical–economic point of view, based on a simulation of the vehicle under standardized driving cycles, thus evaluating the capital and running electricity costs. The obtained results show that the comparison between the two solutions is very open, and in the majority of cases, the advantages in terms of efficiency overcome the disadvantages due to the additional capital costs. For a rather low battery cost of 150 €/kWh, the total cost reduction moves from about 100–150 € up to 1500–2000 €, depending on the electricity cost, along the whole vehicle lifespan.
电池电动汽车:有多少齿轮?技术经济分析
绝大多数电动汽车都采用单速变速箱,因为电气化动力系统可在较宽的工作范围内提供最大功率,而且单速变速箱可简化结构并降低投资成本。不过,多速变速箱也已为电动汽车开发出来,其中一些最近已成为商业产品。本文旨在通过一些实际案例,比较单速变速器和双速变速器的解决方案。特别是,考虑到电动汽车的驾驶非常平稳,在双速解决方案中,考虑了双离合器变速箱。最后,还使用了无级变速器(CVT)。从技术经济角度对不同的解决方案进行了分析,分析的基础是在标准化驾驶周期下对车辆进行模拟,从而评估资本成本和运行电费。结果表明,两种解决方案之间的比较是非常开放的,在大多数情况下,效率方面的优势克服了额外资本成本带来的劣势。对于 150 欧元/千瓦时的较低电池成本而言,根据电费的不同,在整个车辆寿命期间,总成本可从约 100-150 欧元降至 1500-2000 欧元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信