An Orientalist Today: Jonathan A.C. Brown's Thoughts on Hadith

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Ulumuna Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.20414/ujis.v27i2.767
Nur Hamidah Pulungan
{"title":"An Orientalist Today: Jonathan A.C. Brown's Thoughts on Hadith","authors":"Nur Hamidah Pulungan","doi":"10.20414/ujis.v27i2.767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term \"Orientalist\" refers to scholars, mostly from the West, who specialize in studying Eastern cultures, including Islamic texts such as the Quran and Hadith. This study explores the views of a contemporary Orientalist, namely Jonathan Andrew Cleveland Brown, on Hadith. Grounding on Brown's works on hadith and related topics as the main data,  this study found that Brown has introduced a distinctive concept known as “the canonization theory”, typically applied as a stage in the cult or development of the Bible and Torah. Brown has applied the theory to explore the history of the books of hadith composed by Bukhari and Muslim. His perspective ultimately supports the consensus of Muslim scholars who consider Sahih Bukhari and Muslim as the primary source of Islamic law after the Quran. The canonization of Sahihain has undergone extensive study and critique from hadith experts. The reception of Sahih Bukhari has also experienced dynamics, such as the rejection by the Naisabur community, who favored Sahih Muslim, until Sahih Bukhari was established as the foremost reference on hadith, inspiring the development of a new epistemology in the study of hadith. Overall, Brown advocates for a balanced approach to Hadith, respecting Islamic tradition while maintaining a critical and scientific perspective in understanding and interpreting hadith.","PeriodicalId":55654,"journal":{"name":"Ulumuna","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulumuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i2.767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term "Orientalist" refers to scholars, mostly from the West, who specialize in studying Eastern cultures, including Islamic texts such as the Quran and Hadith. This study explores the views of a contemporary Orientalist, namely Jonathan Andrew Cleveland Brown, on Hadith. Grounding on Brown's works on hadith and related topics as the main data,  this study found that Brown has introduced a distinctive concept known as “the canonization theory”, typically applied as a stage in the cult or development of the Bible and Torah. Brown has applied the theory to explore the history of the books of hadith composed by Bukhari and Muslim. His perspective ultimately supports the consensus of Muslim scholars who consider Sahih Bukhari and Muslim as the primary source of Islamic law after the Quran. The canonization of Sahihain has undergone extensive study and critique from hadith experts. The reception of Sahih Bukhari has also experienced dynamics, such as the rejection by the Naisabur community, who favored Sahih Muslim, until Sahih Bukhari was established as the foremost reference on hadith, inspiring the development of a new epistemology in the study of hadith. Overall, Brown advocates for a balanced approach to Hadith, respecting Islamic tradition while maintaining a critical and scientific perspective in understanding and interpreting hadith.
今天的东方学家乔纳森-布朗关于圣训的思考
东方学家 "一词指的是专门研究东方文化(包括《古兰经》和圣训等伊斯兰文本)的学者,他们大多来自西方。本研究探讨了当代东方学家乔纳森-安德鲁-克利夫兰-布朗(Jonathan Andrew Cleveland Brown)对圣训的看法。本研究以布朗关于圣训和相关主题的著作为主要资料,发现布朗提出了一个独特的概念,即 "圣典化理论",通常被用作《圣经》和《托拉》的崇拜或发展阶段。布朗运用这一理论探讨了布哈里和穆斯林所著圣训集的历史。他的观点最终支持了穆斯林学者的共识,他们认为《布哈里圣训集》和《穆斯林圣训集》是继《古兰经》之后伊斯兰法律的主要来源。圣训集》的正典化经历了圣训专家的广泛研究和批评。对《布哈里圣训实录》的接受也经历了一些动态变化,例如奈萨布尔社区对《穆斯林圣训实录》的排斥,直到《布哈里圣训实录》被确立为圣训方面最重要的参考资料,激发了圣训研究中新认识论的发展。总之,布朗主张对圣训采取一种平衡的方法,既尊重伊斯兰传统,又在理解和解释圣训时保持批判和科学的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信