Opinion 2500 (Case 3790) – Proposed review of Opinion 2404 and reconsideration of Case 3633: Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida; Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia, Actiniaria): proposed precedence over Exaiptasia diaphana (Rapp, 1829) not approved

{"title":"Opinion 2500 (Case 3790) – Proposed review of Opinion 2404 and reconsideration of Case 3633: Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida; Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia, Actiniaria): proposed precedence over Exaiptasia diaphana (Rapp, 1829) not approved","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v80.a029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to reverse Opinion 2404 regarding Case 3633 which would have resulted in giving priority to the species-group name Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida) over Dysactis diaphana Rapp, 1829 (currently Exaiptasia diaphana). As a result, the Ruling given in Opinion 2404 stands and the species-group name pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864, as published in the binomen Dysactis pallida, will not be given precedence over the species-group name diaphana Rapp, 1829, as published in the binomen Actinia diaphana, whenever the two are considered synonyms.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v80.a029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to reverse Opinion 2404 regarding Case 3633 which would have resulted in giving priority to the species-group name Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 (currently Exaiptasia pallida) over Dysactis diaphana Rapp, 1829 (currently Exaiptasia diaphana). As a result, the Ruling given in Opinion 2404 stands and the species-group name pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864, as published in the binomen Dysactis pallida, will not be given precedence over the species-group name diaphana Rapp, 1829, as published in the binomen Actinia diaphana, whenever the two are considered synonyms.
第 2500 号意见(第 3790 号案件)--建议复审第 2404 号意见并重新审议第 3633 号案件:Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864(目前为 Exaiptasia pallida;Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia, Actiniaria):建议优先于 Exaiptasia diaphana (Rapp, 1829) 未获批准
摘要。国际动物学命名委员会拒绝利用其全体会议的权力推翻关于第 3633 号案件的第 2404 号意见,该意见本会使 Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill, 1864(现名 Exaiptasia pallida)的种群名称优先于 Dysactis diaphana Rapp, 1829(现名 Exaiptasia diaphana)。因此,第 2404 号意见中的裁定仍然有效,当 Dysactis pallida 和 diaphana 被认为是同义词时,发表在 Dysactis pallida 双名中的 Agassiz in Verrill, 1864 的种群名称 pallida 将不会优先于发表在 Actinia diaphana 双名中的种群名称 diaphana Rapp, 1829。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信