Assessing the Scholarly Landscape: A Bibliometric Journey through Credit Rating Agency Research

Shafna.T, Dr. E K Satheesh
{"title":"Assessing the Scholarly Landscape: A Bibliometric Journey through Credit Rating Agency Research","authors":"Shafna.T, Dr. E K Satheesh","doi":"10.52783/eel.v13i5.960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit Rating Agencies play a crucial role in the financial markets by providing independent assessments of borrowers' creditworthiness. Rating agencies give useful information about performance and creditworthiness of companies, which aids in reducing information asymmetry and it serve as a signal for the likelihood of default which allows investors and market participants to make informed decisions . It is considered as powerful institutions capable of influencing bond and stock prices. The credibility of rating agencies has been question due to their role in the 2008 financial crisis. Their credibility may be impacted by a number of reasons. The study reviewed literature added in credit-rating agency domain from January 2004 to October 2023. Bibliometric analysis is used to comprehend the existing literature. The review recouped 237 research articles on Credit Rating Agency from the Scopus database and envisioned the data using VOS viewer software and Biblioshiny from R studio. We found that most of the studies emerged as after-effects of financial crisis reported in 2008. We have provided a feasible research agenda to further explore credit-rating agency domain. The study not only enhanced the understanding of the scholarly landscape within the scope of the study but also provided a comprehensive assessment of the literature.","PeriodicalId":507836,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Letters (EEL)","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Letters (EEL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52783/eel.v13i5.960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Credit Rating Agencies play a crucial role in the financial markets by providing independent assessments of borrowers' creditworthiness. Rating agencies give useful information about performance and creditworthiness of companies, which aids in reducing information asymmetry and it serve as a signal for the likelihood of default which allows investors and market participants to make informed decisions . It is considered as powerful institutions capable of influencing bond and stock prices. The credibility of rating agencies has been question due to their role in the 2008 financial crisis. Their credibility may be impacted by a number of reasons. The study reviewed literature added in credit-rating agency domain from January 2004 to October 2023. Bibliometric analysis is used to comprehend the existing literature. The review recouped 237 research articles on Credit Rating Agency from the Scopus database and envisioned the data using VOS viewer software and Biblioshiny from R studio. We found that most of the studies emerged as after-effects of financial crisis reported in 2008. We have provided a feasible research agenda to further explore credit-rating agency domain. The study not only enhanced the understanding of the scholarly landscape within the scope of the study but also provided a comprehensive assessment of the literature.
评估学术景观:信用评级机构研究的文献计量之旅
信用评级机构通过对借款人的信用度进行独立评估,在金融市场中发挥着至关重要的作用。评级机构提供有关公司业绩和信用度的有用信息,有助于减少信息不对称,并作为违约可能性的信号,使投资者和市场参与者能够做出知情决策。评级机构被认为是能够影响债券和股票价格的强大机构。由于评级机构在 2008 年金融危机中扮演的角色,其公信力受到质疑。影响其公信力的原因有很多。本研究回顾了 2004 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间信用评级机构领域的文献。文献计量分析用于理解现有文献。研究从 Scopus 数据库中检索了 237 篇有关信用评级机构的研究文章,并使用 VOS 浏览器软件和 R studio 中的 Biblioshiny 对数据进行了设想。我们发现,大多数研究都是在 2008 年报告的金融危机之后出现的。我们为进一步探索信用评级机构领域提供了可行的研究议程。这项研究不仅增进了对研究范围内学术状况的了解,还对文献进行了全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信