Risqi Aula Rifaldi, Trinah Asi Islami, Wedi Pratanto Rahayu Pratanto Rahayu
{"title":"KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEREK PADA POLO BY RALP LAUREN (Studi putusan No 83/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst)","authors":"Risqi Aula Rifaldi, Trinah Asi Islami, Wedi Pratanto Rahayu Pratanto Rahayu","doi":"10.37303/magister.v14i2.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Settlement of disputes over the Polo by Ralph Laurem brand according to the commercial court decision no 83/pdt.sus- HKI/Merek2022//PN NiagaJkt.Pst. In this decision, the panel of judges stated that the plaintiff was the holder of the Polo by Ralph Lauren brand under list number 173934. Based on the decision it was proven that the defendant knew that the plaintiff was the owner of the trademark rights but the defendant ignored this fact and filed an application for brands in bad faith, namely by imitating the Plaintiff's Polo by Ralph Lauren brand. That based on the facts in the decision the defendant did not know. This type of research is normative juridical using secondary data as the main research data. The data were obtained from the Law on Trademarks and the decision of the Central Jakarta Commercial Court regarding the brand restriction and supplemented with secondary data in the form of books and articles with similar discussions. The data were collected using library techniques by reviewing the findings, analyzing and interpreting them based on the prepared theory. Data processing is done in a deductive way through propositions and theories that are general in nature led to specific facts so that they become a description that can be more easily understood. Court decision No 83/pdt.sus-HKI/Merek2022//PN NiagaJkt.Pst.. Established that the Central Jakarta Commercial Court In this decision, the panel of judges stated that the plaintiff was the holder of the Polo by Ralph Lauren trademark under register number 173934. Keywords : tradermark, Court decision, Polo by Ralp Lauren","PeriodicalId":441760,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","volume":" 859","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v14i2.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Settlement of disputes over the Polo by Ralph Laurem brand according to the commercial court decision no 83/pdt.sus- HKI/Merek2022//PN NiagaJkt.Pst. In this decision, the panel of judges stated that the plaintiff was the holder of the Polo by Ralph Lauren brand under list number 173934. Based on the decision it was proven that the defendant knew that the plaintiff was the owner of the trademark rights but the defendant ignored this fact and filed an application for brands in bad faith, namely by imitating the Plaintiff's Polo by Ralph Lauren brand. That based on the facts in the decision the defendant did not know. This type of research is normative juridical using secondary data as the main research data. The data were obtained from the Law on Trademarks and the decision of the Central Jakarta Commercial Court regarding the brand restriction and supplemented with secondary data in the form of books and articles with similar discussions. The data were collected using library techniques by reviewing the findings, analyzing and interpreting them based on the prepared theory. Data processing is done in a deductive way through propositions and theories that are general in nature led to specific facts so that they become a description that can be more easily understood. Court decision No 83/pdt.sus-HKI/Merek2022//PN NiagaJkt.Pst.. Established that the Central Jakarta Commercial Court In this decision, the panel of judges stated that the plaintiff was the holder of the Polo by Ralph Lauren trademark under register number 173934. Keywords : tradermark, Court decision, Polo by Ralp Lauren
关于 RALP LAUREN 公司解决 POLO 品牌争议的法律审查(第 83/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst 号决定的研究报告)
根据商事法院第 83/pdt.sus- HKI/Merek2022//PN NiagaJkt.Pst 号裁决解决有关 Polo by Ralph Laurem 品牌的争议。在该裁决中,法官小组指出,原告是名单编号为 173934 的 Polo by Ralph Lauren 品牌的持有人。根据该裁决,被告明知原告是商标权所有人,但却无视这一事实,恶意提出品牌申请,即模仿原告的 Polo by Ralph Lauren 品牌。根据判决中的事实,被告并不知情。此类研究属于规范法学研究,使用二手数据作为主要研究数据。数据来源于《商标法》和雅加达中央商事法院关于品牌限制的判决,并以类似讨论的书籍和文章形式的二手数据作为补充。数据收集采用了图书馆技术,根据准备好的理论对调查结果进行审查、分析和解释。数据处理以演绎的方式进行,通过一般性的命题和理论引出具体的事实,使其成为更容易理解的描述。第 83/pdt.sus-HKI/Merek2022//PN NiagaJkt.Pst.号法院判决。雅加达中央商事法院在该判决中裁定,原告是注册号为 173934 的 Polo by Ralph Lauren 商标的持有人。 关键词 : 商标、法院判决、Polo by Ralp Lauren