Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for Recurrent Hypertensive Emergency due to Bilateral Renal Artery Stenosis

Hayes Michael, Sexton Donal J
{"title":"Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for Recurrent Hypertensive Emergency due to Bilateral Renal Artery Stenosis","authors":"Hayes Michael, Sexton Donal J","doi":"10.23937/2474-3690/1510076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS) causing recurrent hypertensive emergency and pulmonary oedema is difficult to manage. Use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) is usually contraindicated. We present a systematic review of literature and a case vignette which highlights the useful properties of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in this scenario. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Online searches were also conducted. Eligible studies involved the use of MRAs in bilateral RAS. Our search included case reports, case series, case-controls, cohort studies, randomised controlled trials, and systematic reviews. Consensus guidelines on the management of bilateral RAS were also included. Results: 354 abstracts were screened. One case report was included for review. This reported successful use of eplerenone in bilateral RAS following unilateral renal artery stenting. Online search yielded one international guideline for inclusion. This did not mention the use of MRAs in bilateral RAS. Discussion and conclusion: There is no evidence or recommendations from controlled trials, cohort studies, or consensus guidelines to inform clinicians on the use of MRAs in bilateral RAS. One case report describes successful use of eplerenone for management of refractory hypertension secondary to bilateral RAS. We describe our experience of the successful addition of spironolactone to an anti-hypertensive regimen which prevented recurrence of hypertensive emergency and pulmonary oedema in a patient with multiple previous hospital admissions. We feel that MRAs offer an effective and relatively safe but underused option in this condition.","PeriodicalId":91747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hypertension and management","volume":"20 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hypertension and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3690/1510076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS) causing recurrent hypertensive emergency and pulmonary oedema is difficult to manage. Use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) is usually contraindicated. We present a systematic review of literature and a case vignette which highlights the useful properties of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in this scenario. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Online searches were also conducted. Eligible studies involved the use of MRAs in bilateral RAS. Our search included case reports, case series, case-controls, cohort studies, randomised controlled trials, and systematic reviews. Consensus guidelines on the management of bilateral RAS were also included. Results: 354 abstracts were screened. One case report was included for review. This reported successful use of eplerenone in bilateral RAS following unilateral renal artery stenting. Online search yielded one international guideline for inclusion. This did not mention the use of MRAs in bilateral RAS. Discussion and conclusion: There is no evidence or recommendations from controlled trials, cohort studies, or consensus guidelines to inform clinicians on the use of MRAs in bilateral RAS. One case report describes successful use of eplerenone for management of refractory hypertension secondary to bilateral RAS. We describe our experience of the successful addition of spironolactone to an anti-hypertensive regimen which prevented recurrence of hypertensive emergency and pulmonary oedema in a patient with multiple previous hospital admissions. We feel that MRAs offer an effective and relatively safe but underused option in this condition.
矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂治疗双侧肾动脉狭窄导致的复发性高血压急症
简介导致复发性高血压急症和肺水肿的双侧肾动脉狭窄(RAS)很难处理。通常禁用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)。我们对文献进行了系统回顾,并通过一则病例强调了矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)在这种情况下的有用特性。研究方法检索了 Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials。此外还进行了在线搜索。符合条件的研究涉及在双侧 RAS 中使用 MRA。我们的检索包括病例报告、系列病例、病例对照、队列研究、随机对照试验和系统综述。此外还包括有关双侧 RAS 管理的共识指南。结果:共筛选出 354 篇摘要。一份病例报告被纳入审查范围。该报告称在单侧肾动脉支架术后成功使用依普利酮治疗双侧 RAS。在线搜索得到一份国际指南供纳入。该指南并未提及在双侧 RAS 中使用 MRA。讨论与结论:目前还没有来自对照试验、队列研究或共识指南的证据或建议来指导临床医生在双侧 RAS 中使用 MRA。一份病例报告描述了成功使用依普利酮治疗继发于双侧 RAS 的难治性高血压。我们介绍了在抗高血压治疗方案中添加螺内酯的成功经验,该方案防止了一名曾多次入院的患者再次出现高血压急症和肺水肿。我们认为,在这种情况下,MRA 是一种有效且相对安全的选择,但却未得到充分利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信